In this groundbreaking history of the modern American metropolis, Richard Rothstein, a leading authority on housing policy, explodes the myth that America’s cities came to be racially divided through de facto segregation―that is, through individual prejudices, income differences, or the actions of private institutions like banks and real estate agencies. Rather, The Color of Law incontrovertibly makes clear that it was de jure segregation―the laws and policy decisions passed by local, state, and federal governments―that actually promoted the discriminatory patterns that continue to this day.
Through extraordinary revelations and extensive research that Ta-Nehisi Coates has lauded as "brilliant" (The Atlantic), Rothstein comes to chronicle nothing less than an untold story that begins in the 1920s, showing how this process of de jure segregation began with explicit racial zoning, as millions of African Americans moved in a great historical migration from the south to the north.
Through extraordinary revelations and extensive research that Ta-Nehisi Coates has lauded as "brilliant" (The Atlantic), Rothstein comes to chronicle nothing less than an untold story that begins in the 1920s, showing how this process of de jure segregation began with explicit racial zoning, as millions of African Americans moved in a great historical migration from the south to the north.
The Fair Housing Act of 1968 prohibited future discrimination but did nothing to reverse residential patterns that had become deeply embedded. Yet recent outbursts of violence in cities like Baltimore, Ferguson, and Minneapolis show us precisely how the legacy of these earlier eras contributes to persistent racial unrest. “The American landscape will never look the same to readers of this important book” (Sherrilyn Ifill, president of the NAACP Legal Defense Fund), as Rothstein’s invaluable examination shows that only by relearning this history can we finally pave the way for the nation to remedy its unconstitutional past.
Richard Rothstein is a research associate of the Economic Policy Institute and a Fellow at the Thurgood Marshall Institute of the NAACP Legal Defense Fund. He lives in California, where he is a Fellow of the Haas Institute at the University of California–Berkeley.
承lk兄亲手赠书,当时只是随口答应给他写个书评,但说出去的话总觉得是一份承诺,于是假期后半段聚起精神把书看完了,所思所想汇成此篇。(除掉扯闲篇的部分,评论约800字) 上文有修饰成分哈哈哈(但绝无谎言),真相是公号抽奖中的书,正好奖品提供者纸间悦动的总编住我家左近...
評分作为资本主义世界的“自由国度”,美国的制度优势广泛为人所知,不过,美国社会也存在不少问题,其中就包括种族问题。在民权运动取得瞩目成功之前,美国的种族隔离状况可谓令人瞠目(现在也没有完全扭转):相比白人公民,黑人公民在教育、就业、婚姻、住房、交通等方面遭遇到...
評分 評分美国是三权分立的吃螃蟹者,然而美国的立国先贤即使思想再超前,他们也不能逃过时代的局限。 法律从来不是一成不变的,因为法律是经济的反应,经济是流动的,法律也是实时变化的。法律只要是人制定的、执行的,它不管怎么被标榜,终究还是要受人的影响,尤其是受多数利益者影响...
立足於Supreme Court Jurisprudence (Bradley v. Milliken, Parents Involved in Cmty. Sch. v. Seattle Sch. Dist. No. 1),反轉其所接受的錯誤的事實前提,用大量事實反駁瞭residential segregation單純由文化偏見與私人行為造成的迷思,而說明美國各級的政府行為如何助長乃至造就瞭隔離的現狀,從而主張政府具有彌補過錯的憲法責任;對居住環境的種族隔離及總體意義上的收入歧視之間的經濟學分析直截有力,雖然還有值得深入探討與補充之處。最後感嘆一下各種五花八門的手段簡直就是一部當代美帝對付低端人口史。
评分#非常厲害的曆史研究作品,梳理客觀而尖銳,就連展望未來的最後一節的論述都能保持這種剋製而真實的書寫態度,實在讓人敬佩。如果要瞭解種族隔離和當前美國的種族現狀,這本書應該算是“必須讀”。
评分For who believe this difficult history of America, this is a great book to read about racial separation and discrimination. For who don't believe, the book will in a trash can.
评分For who believe this difficult history of America, this is a great book to read about racial separation and discrimination. For who don't believe, the book will in a trash can.
评分For who believe this difficult history of America, this is a great book to read about racial separation and discrimination. For who don't believe, the book will in a trash can.
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美書屋 版权所有