Governing the Commons pdf epub mobi txt 電子書 下載2025
Elinor Ostrom (née Awan; born August 7, 1933) is an American political economist.[2] She was awarded the 2009 Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences, which she shared with Oliver E. Williamson, for "her analysis of economic governance, especially the commons."[3] She was the first, and to date, the only woman to win the prize in this category. Her work is associated with the new institutional economics and the resurgence of political economy.[4]
Ostrom lives in Bloomington, IN, and is on the faculty of both Indiana University and Arizona State University. She holds a Distinguished Professor at Indiana University and is the Arthur F. Bentley Professor of Political Science and Co-Director of the Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis at Indiana University in Bloomington, as well as Research Professor and the Founding Director of the Center for the Study of Institutional Diversity at Arizona State University in Tempe. Ostrom also serves as a lead researcher for the Sustainable Agriculture and Natural Resource Management Collaborative Research Support Program (SANREM CRSP), managed by Virginia Tech and funded by USAID.[5]
- 經濟學
- 製度
- 公共産權
- 政治學
- 美國
- PoliticalEconomy
- economics
- Political-Science
The governance of natural resources used by many individuals in common is an issue of increasing concern to policy analysts. Both state control and privatisation of resources have been advocated, but neither the state nor the market have been uniformly successful in solving common pool resource problems. Offering a critique of the foundations of policy analysis as applied to natural resources, Elinor Ostrom here provides a unique body of empirical data to explore conditions under which common pool resource problems have been satisfactorily or unsatisfactorily solved. Dr Ostrom first describes three models most frequently used as the foundation for recommending state or market solutions. She then outlines theoretical and empirical alternatives to these models in order to illustrate the diversity of possible solutions. In the following chapters she uses institutional analysis to examine different ways - both successful and unsuccessful - of governing the commons. In contrast to the proposition of the tragedy of the commons argument, common pool problems sometimes are solved by voluntary organisations rather than by a coercive state. Among the cases considered are communal tenure in meadows and forests, irrigation communities and other water rights, and fisheries.
具體描述
讀後感
由于学识尚浅，没有很高深的评论。 不知道是不是因为作者是女性的缘故，我认为她的分析是非常有“人情味儿”的。现在许多理论是机械式的，将人们当做有固定程式的机器人来进行分析的，而且常常令人感到冷漠和绝望——比如众所周知的理性经济人假设。而作者认为...
評分正如上贴所言，为何无人识，确实非常奇怪的，国内学者好像很少引用这本书，研究新制度经济学的，对这本书好像推荐不多？自己还是上西方财政学时，老师在讲公共品时，对这本书有初步的介绍。作者研究的是社区合作，而这不在政府与市场之内，也许这就是被经济学家们忽略的...
評分五年前在清华共管学院进修时曾听过奥斯特罗姆的讲座，但全程英文，且当时我并未看过她的经典著作《公共事物的治理之道》，奔赴她的讲座纯属对第一位获得诺贝尔经济学奖女性的好奇。学院的王亚华老师曾赴美在她手下学习过一段时间，在公管院那么长时间，我也只听过他一次讲座，...
評分〇、写在前面： 这本书我只读了一遍，有些地方也不尽其然；对于全书的把握并非完全正确和深入，所以以下所有部分为个人观点，保留版权，切勿随意转载使用，仅供参考。 一、一些名词解释： 分权制企业：个人觉得这个“企业”翻译成组织或者结构就容易理解了，比如在修建水渠的...
評分首先承认这个标题确实有“姨学”的感觉，因为刘数卷阿姨经常把这句话挂在嘴边（无非就是指他们远邪党是中国未来的种子云云）。但是这句诗文本来就不是他的专利，他能用，我也能用。 这本书着实令我喜出望外------对山泽林薮这样的重要资源，到底是应该由国家进行管控还是应该由...
用戶評價
針對公地問題私有化&政府管製外的第三條道路，非常有啓發性！(作者是第一位女性諾貝爾經濟學奬獲得者，????????
评分4星。當年轟動一時，而且讓作者得瞭諾貝爾經濟學奬。但是仔細想想有一些過譽。作者真正的貢獻在於提齣解決CPR問題不能隻靠國傢或者市場，因為二者（尤其是前者）可能會缺乏地方信息。但這一點實際上哈耶剋很早就講瞭（大約作者寫這書50年前），所以不是很清楚這本書真正的貢獻在什麼地方。作者提齣的8條解決CPR的建議都需要嚴格的論證和實證檢驗，而這些是這本書沒有提供的。作者的分析方法主要是比較案例，但是沒有迴答為什麼要關心這些案例？以90年代的標準看，這本書依然是上乘之作，但是放在今天，閱讀的收獲會比較小。最重要的是，為什麼自治組織不能産生特殊利益？這是我在美國最常見的一種問題，所以我覺得Olson還是更高一籌。
评分譚老師退休，想起來奧斯特羅姆夫婦，想起來我開政治學係還留存什麼遺産，想起來我始終不是學政治科學的料，譚老師及之後Wilson所帶給我的那些絲微的興趣，也許隻是斯德哥爾摩。
评分諾貝爾奬獲得者的著作還是很值得一讀，模型概念論述加案例分析詳實且有創新，標杆啊
评分假裝讀明白瞭
相關圖書
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息，本站不存儲任何數據與內容，任何內容與數據均與本站無關，如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美書屋 版权所有