The governance of natural resources used by many individuals in common is an issue of increasing concern to policy analysts. Both state control and privatisation of resources have been advocated, but neither the state nor the market have been uniformly successful in solving common pool resource problems. Offering a critique of the foundations of policy analysis as applied to natural resources, Elinor Ostrom here provides a unique body of empirical data to explore conditions under which common pool resource problems have been satisfactorily or unsatisfactorily solved. Dr Ostrom first describes three models most frequently used as the foundation for recommending state or market solutions. She then outlines theoretical and empirical alternatives to these models in order to illustrate the diversity of possible solutions. In the following chapters she uses institutional analysis to examine different ways - both successful and unsuccessful - of governing the commons. In contrast to the proposition of the tragedy of the commons argument, common pool problems sometimes are solved by voluntary organisations rather than by a coercive state. Among the cases considered are communal tenure in meadows and forests, irrigation communities and other water rights, and fisheries.
Elinor Ostrom (née Awan; born August 7, 1933) is an American political economist.[2] She was awarded the 2009 Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences, which she shared with Oliver E. Williamson, for "her analysis of economic governance, especially the commons."[3] She was the first, and to date, the only woman to win the prize in this category. Her work is associated with the new institutional economics and the resurgence of political economy.[4]
Ostrom lives in Bloomington, IN, and is on the faculty of both Indiana University and Arizona State University. She holds a Distinguished Professor at Indiana University and is the Arthur F. Bentley Professor of Political Science and Co-Director of the Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis at Indiana University in Bloomington, as well as Research Professor and the Founding Director of the Center for the Study of Institutional Diversity at Arizona State University in Tempe. Ostrom also serves as a lead researcher for the Sustainable Agriculture and Natural Resource Management Collaborative Research Support Program (SANREM CRSP), managed by Virginia Tech and funded by USAID.[5]
第一次上导师的课,老师就讲了如何读书的问题,听后深感惋惜,要是早听四年的话,估计我的本科生涯不会那么混乱,当然这也与我的性格有关,不过总不至于那么混乱。老师说读书应该按照由近及远、由专到通、强调专业和兴趣,并要求书籍与文章兼顾,因为后来出现的书一般都会...
評分 評分本書的作者是公共經濟學與公共選擇學派的創始人之一,埃莉諾・奧斯特羅姆(Elinor Ostrom)。副標題叫做“集體行動制度的演進”.在我看來,其副標題,簡明扼要點出全書的核心。 開頭要說一說關於翻譯的事情,我不確定原書當中如何遣詞造句,但此書翻譯的水準讓我來說到底有...
評分经济学解决“公地悲剧”的第三条道路 经济学将自己的理论建立在“理性人”的基础上,也就是说个人的私利,通过市场这个“看不见的手”,能够导致公利的产生。从亚当·斯密到曼德维尔,然后经过20世纪的哈耶克和弗里德曼等人的完善,让自私成为了一种美德。 自由市场经济理论的...
評分在新版的政治科学手册中,本书被排在二战后引用率最高的四部政治学著作之一,然而我们却不得不记住,这部作品是在1990年才出版的。作者艾利诺·奥斯特罗姆女士更是当代美国最负盛名的政治学者之一,曾经担任美国政治学会主席一职。如果继续各种头衔和荣誉的介绍,我都会觉...
諾貝爾奬獲得者的著作還是很值得一讀,模型概念論述加案例分析詳實且有創新,標杆啊
评分作者實在是太considerate瞭,每一個道理都講得相當透徹,經常是我剛剛寫下心得就發現下一句正是我寫的心得的意思...
评分譚老師退休,想起來奧斯特羅姆夫婦,想起來我開政治學係還留存什麼遺産,想起來我始終不是學政治科學的料,譚老師及之後Wilson所帶給我的那些絲微的興趣,也許隻是斯德哥爾摩。
评分作者實在是太considerate瞭,每一個道理都講得相當透徹,經常是我剛剛寫下心得就發現下一句正是我寫的心得的意思...
评分看過較久,有些內容記不清瞭。大體記得是從“公用地悲劇”和博弈論齣發解讀collective action的一本書,中間列舉豐富例證證明信息互動、共享價值觀、外在監督的作用。最後的結論把作者的觀點梳理得很清晰。作者自己是很有名的instistutionalism研究者,這本書寫得也很透徹易懂(至少比起D.C.North是這樣,斜眼)。
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美書屋 版权所有