For more than two hundred years controversy has raged over the reliability of the Old Testament. Questions about the factuality of its colorful stories of heroes, villains, and kings, for example, have led many critics to see the entire Hebrew Bible as little more than pious fiction. In this fascinating book, noted ancient historian K. A. Kitchen takes strong issue with today's "revisionist" critics and offers a firm foundation for the historicity of the biblical texts. In a detailed, comprehensive, and entertaining manner, Kitchen draws on an unprecedented range of historical data from the ancient Near East - the Bible's own world - and uses it to soundly reassess both the biblical record and the critics who condemn it. Working back from the latest periods (for which hard evidence is readily available) to the remotest times, Kitchen systematically shows up the many failures of favored arguments against the Bible and marshals pertinent permanent evidence from antiquity's inscriptions and artifacts to demonstrate the basic honesty of the Old Testament writers. Enhanced with numerous tables, figures, and maps, "On the Reliability of the Old Testament" is a must-read for anyone interested in the question of biblical truth.
具體描述
讀後感
評分
評分
評分
評分
用戶評價
Kitchen采用兩重比照的方法。即比照舊約文獻內部的曆史閤理性，並且將舊約與古代近東文獻相關曆史綫索進行比照，所以是很有理有據的。全書是一個完整的論證，在如此長的篇幅中跟著作者的思路是很纍人的——更纍人的是滿篇的古代近東地名人名，讀這本書需要很大的耐心。
评分讀完一章腦子都要流成水瞭，但是還的確必須讀。Solid research.
评分Kitchen采用兩重比照的方法。即比照舊約文獻內部的曆史閤理性，並且將舊約與古代近東文獻相關曆史綫索進行比照，所以是很有理有據的。全書是一個完整的論證，在如此長的篇幅中跟著作者的思路是很纍人的——更纍人的是滿篇的古代近東地名人名，讀這本書需要很大的耐心。
评分Kitchen采用兩重比照的方法。即比照舊約文獻內部的曆史閤理性，並且將舊約與古代近東文獻相關曆史綫索進行比照，所以是很有理有據的。全書是一個完整的論證，在如此長的篇幅中跟著作者的思路是很纍人的——更纍人的是滿篇的古代近東地名人名，讀這本書需要很大的耐心。
评分Kitchen采用兩重比照的方法。即比照舊約文獻內部的曆史閤理性，並且將舊約與古代近東文獻相關曆史綫索進行比照，所以是很有理有據的。全書是一個完整的論證，在如此長的篇幅中跟著作者的思路是很纍人的——更纍人的是滿篇的古代近東地名人名，讀這本書需要很大的耐心。
相關圖書
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息，本站不存儲任何數據與內容，任何內容與數據均與本站無關，如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美書屋 版权所有