For more than two hundred years controversy has raged over the reliability of the Old Testament. Questions about the factuality of its colorful stories of heroes, villains, and kings, for example, have led many critics to see the entire Hebrew Bible as little more than pious fiction. In this fascinating book, noted ancient historian K. A. Kitchen takes strong issue with today's "revisionist" critics and offers a firm foundation for the historicity of the biblical texts. In a detailed, comprehensive, and entertaining manner, Kitchen draws on an unprecedented range of historical data from the ancient Near East - the Bible's own world - and uses it to soundly reassess both the biblical record and the critics who condemn it. Working back from the latest periods (for which hard evidence is readily available) to the remotest times, Kitchen systematically shows up the many failures of favored arguments against the Bible and marshals pertinent permanent evidence from antiquity's inscriptions and artifacts to demonstrate the basic honesty of the Old Testament writers. Enhanced with numerous tables, figures, and maps, "On the Reliability of the Old Testament" is a must-read for anyone interested in the question of biblical truth.
具体描述
读后感
评分
评分
评分
评分
用户评价
Kitchen采用两重比照的方法。即比照旧约文献内部的历史合理性，并且将旧约与古代近东文献相关历史线索进行比照，所以是很有理有据的。全书是一个完整的论证，在如此长的篇幅中跟着作者的思路是很累人的——更累人的是满篇的古代近东地名人名，读这本书需要很大的耐心。
评分Kitchen采用两重比照的方法。即比照旧约文献内部的历史合理性，并且将旧约与古代近东文献相关历史线索进行比照，所以是很有理有据的。全书是一个完整的论证，在如此长的篇幅中跟着作者的思路是很累人的——更累人的是满篇的古代近东地名人名，读这本书需要很大的耐心。
评分读完一章脑子都要流成水了，但是还的确必须读。Solid research.
评分Kitchen采用两重比照的方法。即比照旧约文献内部的历史合理性，并且将旧约与古代近东文献相关历史线索进行比照，所以是很有理有据的。全书是一个完整的论证，在如此长的篇幅中跟着作者的思路是很累人的——更累人的是满篇的古代近东地名人名，读这本书需要很大的耐心。
评分读完一章脑子都要流成水了，但是还的确必须读。Solid research.
相关图书
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息，本站不存储任何数据与内容，任何内容与数据均与本站无关，如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有