Highlights biological, technological, and cultural as well as economic exchanges on the silk road
Explains the dynamics of silk road communication as a function of the rise of Central Eurasian nomad empires and their interaction with sedentary agrarian states
Disputes the common assertion of a "silk road decline" from around 1500
The phrase "silk road" evokes vivid images: of merchants leading camel caravans over deserts and steppes to trade exotic goods in the bazaars of glittering Oriental cities, of pilgrims braving bandits and frozen mountain passes to gather scriptures and spread their faith across continental expanses. Beyond the exotica, however, this VSI will be a sketch of the historical background against which the silk road flourished, and an essay on the significance of old-world intercultural exchange to Eurasian and world history generally. On the one hand, Millward treats the silk road broadly, as a metonym for the cross-fertilizing communication between peoples across the Eurasian continent since at least the Neolithic era. On the other, he highlights specific examples of goods and ideas exchanged between the Mediterranean, Persian, Indian, and Chinese regions, along with the significance of these exchanges. While including silks, spices, travelers' tales of colorful locales, the main focus of the book is to outline the dynamics of Central Eurasian history that promoted silk road interactions, especially the role of nomad empires; and to highlight the importance of the biological, technological, artistic, intellectual, and religious interchanges across the continent. Millward shows that these exchanges had a profound effect on the old world that was akin to, if not yet on the scale of, modern globalization.
Millward also considers some of the more abstract contemporary uses to which the silk road concept has been put. It is, of course, a popular marketing device for boutiques, museums, restaurants, and tour operators from Venice to Kyoto. More than that, however, the silk road has ideological connotations, used sometimes to soften the face of Chinese expansion in Central Asia, or, in the US culture wars, as a challenge to the "clash of civilizations" understanding of intersocietal relations. Finally, while it has often been argued that the silk road declined or closed after the collapse of the Mongol empire or the opening of direct maritime communications from Europe to Asia, Millard disputes this view, showing how silk road phenomena continued through the early modern and modern expansion of Russian and Chinese states across Central Asia.
Readership: Trade readers interested in the Silk Road, introductory courses in Asian history and world history, high school world history courses, museum-goers at Silk Road exhibits
James A. Millward, Professor of History, School of Foreign Service, Georgetown University, US
James A. Millward is professor of history, School of Foreign Service, Georgetown University. His books include Eurasian Crossroads: A History of Xinjiang.
原著大家手笔,言简意赅,虽也有可议之处(例如他某种程度上将丝绸之路视为全球化的前奏,偏重交流而忽略对抗和断裂,以及书写中有意无意的共时性特质),但予人的启发是不言而喻的。译本也颇流畅,但有几处似宜根据历史语境稍作订正: p.9-10:蒙古帝国的创建者成吉思汗就是靠...
評分 評分原著大家手笔,言简意赅,虽也有可议之处(例如他某种程度上将丝绸之路视为全球化的前奏,偏重交流而忽略对抗和断裂,以及书写中有意无意的共时性特质),但予人的启发是不言而喻的。译本也颇流畅,但有几处似宜根据历史语境稍作订正: p.9-10:蒙古帝国的创建者成吉思汗就是靠...
評分原著大家手笔,言简意赅,虽也有可议之处(例如他某种程度上将丝绸之路视为全球化的前奏,偏重交流而忽略对抗和断裂,以及书写中有意无意的共时性特质),但予人的启发是不言而喻的。译本也颇流畅,但有几处似宜根据历史语境稍作订正: p.9-10:蒙古帝国的创建者成吉思汗就是靠...
評分原著大家手笔,言简意赅,虽也有可议之处(例如他某种程度上将丝绸之路视为全球化的前奏,偏重交流而忽略对抗和断裂,以及书写中有意无意的共时性特质),但予人的启发是不言而喻的。译本也颇流畅,但有几处似宜根据历史语境稍作订正: p.9-10:蒙古帝国的创建者成吉思汗就是靠...
在讀過的幾本裏,這本是這個係列裏寫得比較有意思的。
评分很不錯的入門讀物,推薦給想要對silk road有大緻瞭解的讀者。(真的“非常短”~)
评分相當有趣。
评分比較有意思的是講技術傳播的那一章,米華健很給支那和整個東亞留麵子瞭,但讀者不難從吉光片羽中得齣結論。
评分比較有意思的是講技術傳播的那一章,米華健很給支那和整個東亞留麵子瞭,但讀者不難從吉光片羽中得齣結論。
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美書屋 版权所有