Scanlon offers a sharp challenge to much contemporary moral philosophy. Most philosophers think that agreements between people play only a subsidiary role in moral theory. What is right or wrong is independent of what people accept. Agreements rest on morality; they do not underlie it. Scanlon dissents. In his conception, morality depends on principles it would not be reasonable for people to reject. These agreements do not derive from further moral facts. Scanlon also challenges the view that desires give reasons for action, leveling heavy artillery at the contrary position of Bernard Williams. The originality, scope, and careful argument of this work mark it as an indispensable book.
suppose, a motive exists in any conduct, including donation. The donee's acceptance is an interest for a donor. he elicits the donee's admission that accepting this gift is desirable. acceptance thus has representative value. meanwhile, it has symbolic valu...
評分【在《正义论》中,Rawls更多地将契约论和原初状态理解为一种代表性的工具(representative device),即澄清既定的深思熟虑的道德判断的一种手段,而非某种独立的道德观念的源泉。因为罗尔斯主要关注的是应用于公共领域和社会基本结构的实质性的正义原则,他对契约论的虚置情有...
評分【在《正义论》中,Rawls更多地将契约论和原初状态理解为一种代表性的工具(representative device),即澄清既定的深思熟虑的道德判断的一种手段,而非某种独立的道德观念的源泉。因为罗尔斯主要关注的是应用于公共领域和社会基本结构的实质性的正义原则,他对契约论的虚置情有...
評分【斯坎伦的What we owe to each other(《我们彼此负有什么义务》)是当代道德哲学中契约主义的扛鼎作品。基本内容说来简单:以理由(reasons)为基石,提供了一种契约论的结构来说明较为狭义的、与义务相关的那部分道德。读后觉得,一方面,与Habermas的交往伦理有异曲同工之妙...
評分【斯坎伦的What we owe to each other(《我们彼此负有什么义务》)是当代道德哲学中契约主义的扛鼎作品。基本内容说来简单:以理由(reasons)为基石,提供了一种契约论的结构来说明较为狭义的、与义务相关的那部分道德。读后觉得,一方面,与Habermas的交往伦理有异曲同工之妙...
非常根本、非常清晰,偶爾有些囉嗦,有些不夠銳利。
评分感覺所有的研究,都始於motivation outside consciousness.
评分斯坎倫的分析太贊瞭。提問的方式、如何分析一個概念、如何檢討一個主張(主張成立的閤理性、預設的前提、前提是否混淆瞭一些概念),好好體會。另突然發現這本書的封麵是莫蘭迪,一位隻畫簡單靜物的畫傢,感覺發現瞭什麼...
评分morality based on what we owe to others
评分morality based on what we owe to others
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美書屋 版权所有