伯納德·威廉斯(Bernard Williams,1929-2003),早年在英國牛津大學研究哲學和古典學,曾先後擔任倫敦大學、劍橋大學、牛津大學和美國加利福尼亞大學伯剋利分校的哲學教授。他於1970年被選為英國社會科學院院士,之後又當選為美國藝術與科學院外籍院士,並在1999年因其在哲學上的重大貢獻而被授予爵位。
威廉斯的主要工作領域是倫理學、知識論、心靈哲學和政治哲學。他在早期希臘思想和笛卡爾的研究上建樹卓越,但他最重要的影響是在倫理學方麵。威廉斯對功利主義和康德倫理學的批判,他對道德和道德要求的本質的探究,主導瞭近30年來西方倫理理論的思維,在某種意義上是這一時期最重要的道德哲學傢。
A new volume of philosophical essays by Bernard Williams. The book is a successor to Problems of the Self, but whereas that volume dealt mainly with questions of personal identity, Moral Luck centres on questions of moral philosophy and the theory of rational action. That whole area has of course been strikingly reinvigorated over the last deacde, and philosophers have both broadened and deepened their concerns in a way that now makes much earlier moral and political philosophy look sterile and trivial. Moral Luck contains a number of essays that have contributed influentially to this development. Among the recurring themes are the moral and philosophical limitations of utilitarianism, the notion of integrity, relativism, and problems of moral conflict and rational choice. The work presented here is marked by a high degree of imagination and acuity, and also conveys a strong sense of psychological reality. The volume will be a stimulating source of ideas and arguments for all philosophers and a wide range of other readers.
Jack W. Meiland tries to defend ‘vulgar relativism’ which Bernard Williams criticizes and contrasts with his ‘appraisal relativism’ in his paper ‘The truth in relativism’. Meiland agrees that the distinction between genuine appraisal and notional appr...
評分Moral Luck ——Bernard Williams 写在前面:这是我今年所读到过的最难的论文,威廉斯的写作风格和帕菲特形成了两个极端,前者汪洋恣肆、才华横溢,后者中正平和,谨慎有加。 一、两种道德传统 Williams的论文面对两种道德传统,第一种是一种古代幸福观,第二种是康德主义的道...
評分Jack W. Meiland tries to defend ‘vulgar relativism’ which Bernard Williams criticizes and contrasts with his ‘appraisal relativism’ in his paper ‘The truth in relativism’. Meiland agrees that the distinction between genuine appraisal and notional appr...
評分Jack W. Meiland tries to defend ‘vulgar relativism’ which Bernard Williams criticizes and contrasts with his ‘appraisal relativism’ in his paper ‘The truth in relativism’. Meiland agrees that the distinction between genuine appraisal and notional appr...
評分Moral Luck Bernard Williams Cambridge University Press Moral luck – pp.20-39 高更的决定的成功是无法预测的 1. Luck,要区分 intrinsic luck 和 extrinsic luck: a. 在高更的例子上,intrinsic luck和 成为伟大画家 几乎是 coincide. 也就是说天赋在这个例子上几乎是决...
之前錯怪譯者瞭,這東西真不好讀.......我發現williams的moral luck絕對是DH勞倫斯的大型讀後感啊= =!結閤他自身的離婚經曆,嘖嘖嘖
评分之前錯怪譯者瞭,這東西真不好讀.......我發現williams的moral luck絕對是DH勞倫斯的大型讀後感啊= =!結閤他自身的離婚經曆,嘖嘖嘖
评分Problems of the Self 和 ELP 之間的一個重要文集。老威文章是繞,常常並不交代理論背景就開始迴應問題,而且間或偏技術性地處理問題, 但重要、精彩。
评分二讀。
评分Problems of the Self 和 ELP 之間的一個重要文集。老威文章是繞,常常並不交代理論背景就開始迴應問題,而且間或偏技術性地處理問題, 但重要、精彩。
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美書屋 版权所有