When world-class biblical scholar Bart Ehrman first began to study the texts of the Bible in their original languages he was startled to discover the multitude of mistakes and intentional alterations that had been made by earlier translators. In Misquoting Jesus, Ehrman tells the story behind the mistakes and changes that ancient scribes made to the New Testament and shows the great impact they had upon the Bible we use today. He frames his account with personal reflections on how his study of the Greek manuscripts made him abandon his once ultraconservative views of the Bible. </p>
Since the advent of the printing press and the accurate reproduction of texts, most people have assumed that when they read the New Testament they are reading an exact copy of Jesus's words or Saint Paul's writings. And yet, for almost fifteen hundred years these manuscripts were hand copied by scribes who were deeply influenced by the cultural, theological, and political disputes of their day. Both mistakes and intentional changes abound in the surviving manuscripts, making the original words difficult to reconstruct. For the first time, Ehrman reveals where and why these changes were made and how scholars go about reconstructing the original words of the New Testament as closely as possible. </p>
Ehrman makes the provocative case that many of our cherished biblical stories and widely held beliefs concerning the divinity of Jesus, the Trinity, and the divine origins of the Bible itself stem from both intentional and accidental alterations by scribes -- alterations that dramatically affected all subsequent versions of the Bible. </p>
作者巴特•D•埃尔曼是基督教史的专家,以研究新约和早期教会著称于美国学术界。现为北卡罗来纳大学教堂山分校宗教研究所讲座教授。埃尔曼曾是虔诚的福音派教徒,立志作为知名学者以传播福音,在研究过程中逐渐相信《圣经》文本的误传,认识到《圣经》是历史的产物,是经过人们所改变的,后成为一名不可知论者。
《错引耶稣》的作者是一个宗教的权威学者,曾是《时代》杂志封面人物。 引人入胜的序言,几乎第一时间就让我进入了阅读的状态。 对没有宗教信仰的人,充分的满足了对宗教的好奇:为什么信?信什么?如何信?为什么不信? 作者年轻时即信仰基督,除了家庭和社会环境原因,主要是...
评分还没看完,边写边看边改。 一是里面的资料算是个常识普及,本身不是特别新奇的东西,作者煞有介事,只是从一个侧面反映了福音派比较反智的一面。 二是这些是否构成对基督教的颠覆呢? 作者主要论述的是传抄方面的问题,这本身就不构成颠覆,如果说能证明圣经本身就不是启示,而...
评分内容提要:丹佛神学院高级新约教授克莱格•布劳姆伯格认为,巴尔特•额尔曼《错引耶稣》的内容不过是在“炒冷饭”,基督徒都知道。搞得好像发现了圣经的重大失误似的,唉……有兴趣的读者,可以读读克教授的书评,懂英文的也可以自己去瞧瞧。 http://www.denverseminary....
评分信仰是怎么来的?我们的信仰要依托于什么媒介,教会还是经书?新教创立的本意就是要摆脱天主教会对神的话的误读,但圣经真的就能代表神的话吗? 这本书,最给人启发的地方就在于让我们重新认识到,我们的信仰是多么的脆弱。如果冷静下来去分析各种宗教信仰,我们都会发现一些逻...
评分非常精彩的宗教历史! 这本书讲述了圣经从《旧约》到《新约》的各种版本的迭代历史。作者是专门研究《圣经》版本历史的,他曾经也是虔诚的基督信徒,自从上大学,就动摇了他的信念,变成了一个无神论者。他为了研究《圣经》(最早的版本是古希腊、拉丁语),专程跑到“梵蒂冈”...
但凡基督徒都应该读一下????
评分两三年了,终于拜读。与考古佐证不同,文本梳理的争议更大,内容更枯燥。难得此书,对我这个非信徒,也显得文字通畅。
评分啊哈! 原來如此!!
评分但凡基督徒都应该读一下????
评分但凡基督徒都应该读一下????
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有