图书标签: 施特劳斯 政治哲学 哲学 Strauss 犹太 政治哲學 Political_Philosophy Modernity
发表于2024-11-07
Jewish Philosophy and the Crisis of Modernity pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载 2024
Summary
Explores the impact on Jews and Judaism of the crisis of modernity, analyzing modern Jewish dilemmas and providing a prescription for their resolution.
This is the first book to bring together the major essays and lectures of Leo Strauss in the field of modern Jewish thought. It contains some of his most famous published writings, as well as significant writings which were previously unpublished. Spanning almost 30 years of continuously deepening reflection, the book presents the full range of Strauss's contributions as a modern Jewish thinker.
These essays and lectures also offer Strauss's mature considerations of some of the great figures in modern Jewish thought, such as Baruch Spinoza, Hermann Cohen, Franz Rosenzweig, Martin Buber, Theodor Herzl, and Sigmund Freud. They also encompass his incisive analyses and original explorations of modern Judaism (which he viewed as caught in the grip of the "theological-political crisis"): from German Jewry, anti-semitism, and the Holocaust to Zionism and the State of Israel; from the question of assimilation to the meaning and value of Jewish history. In addition Strauss's two sustained interpretations of the Hebrew Bible are also reprinted.
These essays and lectures cumulatively point toward the "postcritical" reconstruction of Judaism which Strauss envisioned, suggesting it rebuild along Maimonidean lines. Thus, the book lends credence to the view that Strauss was able to uncover and probe the crisis at the heart of modern Jewish thought and history, perhaps with greater profundity than any other contemporary Jewish thinker.
Kenneth Hart Green is Assistant Professor in the Department for the Study of Religion at the University of Toronto.
Table Of Contents
Acknowledgments
Editor's Preface
Editor's Introduction: Leo Strauss as a Modern Jewish Thinker
Part I: Essays in Modern Jewish Thought
1. Progress or Return? (1952)
2. Preface to Spinoza's Critique of Religion (1965)
Part II: Studies of Modern Jewish Thinkers
3. How to Study Spinoza's Theologico-Political Treatise (1948)
4. Preface to Isaac Husik, Philosophical Essays (1952)
5. Introductory Essay to Hermann Cohen, Religion of Reason out of the Sources of Judaism (1972)
Part III: Lectures on Contemporary Jewish Issues
6. Freud on Moses and Monotheism (1958)
7. Why We Remain Jews (1962)
Part IV: Studies on the Hebrew Bible
8. On the Interpretation of Genesis (1957)
9. Jerusalem and Athens (1967)
Part V: Comments on Jewish History
10. What Is Political Philosophy? [The First Paragraph] (1954)
11. Review of J. L. Talmon, The Nature of Jewish History (1957)
12. Letter to the Editor: The State of Israel (1957)
Part VI: Miscellaneous Writings on Jews and Judaism
13. Introduction to Persecution and the Art of Writing (1952)
14. Perspectives on the Good Society (1963)
Part VII: Autobiographical Reflections
15. An Unspoken Prologue (1959)
16. Preface to Hobbes Politische Wissenschaft (1965)
17. A Giving of Accounts (1970)
Appendix 1: Plan of a Book Tentatively Entitled Philosophy and the Law: Historical Essays (1946)
Appendix 2: Restatement on Xenophon's Hiero [The Last Paragraph] (1950)
Appendix 3: Memorial Remarks for Jason Aronson (1961)
Sources
Bibliography
Index
这一直是我所困惑的一个问题:Strauss在与John Klein的公众对谈中似乎明确表示了通常意义上所谓的kaloskagathos并不比Alcibiades更接近哲学家,同时又表示贬低海德格尔的道德教诲(当然其中有resoluteness),并且又认为在克莱恩的general formula中的道德所占据的位置是比施工本人的事物图示更高的。那么这种意义上的从城邦出发的尼采式禁欲主义哲学观,产生出来的到底是柏拉图式的还是伊壁鸠鲁式哲学呢?叙拉古之惑一种。(无论如何吧,即便是in-between也无疑可以肯定起码是一种哲学意义上的主人道德?)
评分这一直是我所困惑的一个问题:Strauss在与John Klein的公众对谈中似乎明确表示了通常意义上所谓的kaloskagathos并不比Alcibiades更接近哲学家,同时又表示贬低海德格尔的道德教诲(当然其中有resoluteness),并且又认为在克莱恩的general formula中的道德所占据的位置是比施工本人的事物图示更高的。那么这种意义上的从城邦出发的尼采式禁欲主义哲学观,产生出来的到底是柏拉图式的还是伊壁鸠鲁式哲学呢?叙拉古之惑一种。(无论如何吧,即便是in-between也无疑可以肯定起码是一种哲学意义上的主人道德?)
评分这一直是我所困惑的一个问题:Strauss在与John Klein的公众对谈中似乎明确表示了通常意义上所谓的kaloskagathos并不比Alcibiades更接近哲学家,同时又表示贬低海德格尔的道德教诲(当然其中有resoluteness),并且又认为在克莱恩的general formula中的道德所占据的位置是比施工本人的事物图示更高的。那么这种意义上的从城邦出发的尼采式禁欲主义哲学观,产生出来的到底是柏拉图式的还是伊壁鸠鲁式哲学呢?叙拉古之惑一种。(无论如何吧,即便是in-between也无疑可以肯定起码是一种哲学意义上的主人道德?)
评分这一直是我所困惑的一个问题:Strauss在与John Klein的公众对谈中似乎明确表示了通常意义上所谓的kaloskagathos并不比Alcibiades更接近哲学家,同时又表示贬低海德格尔的道德教诲(当然其中有resoluteness),并且又认为在克莱恩的general formula中的道德所占据的位置是比施工本人的事物图示更高的。那么这种意义上的从城邦出发的尼采式禁欲主义哲学观,产生出来的到底是柏拉图式的还是伊壁鸠鲁式哲学呢?叙拉古之惑一种。(无论如何吧,即便是in-between也无疑可以肯定起码是一种哲学意义上的主人道德?)
评分这一直是我所困惑的一个问题:Strauss在与John Klein的公众对谈中似乎明确表示了通常意义上所谓的kaloskagathos并不比Alcibiades更接近哲学家,同时又表示贬低海德格尔的道德教诲(当然其中有resoluteness),并且又认为在克莱恩的general formula中的道德所占据的位置是比施工本人的事物图示更高的。那么这种意义上的从城邦出发的尼采式禁欲主义哲学观,产生出来的到底是柏拉图式的还是伊壁鸠鲁式哲学呢?叙拉古之惑一种。(无论如何吧,即便是in-between也无疑可以肯定起码是一种哲学意义上的主人道德?)
leo strauss所强调的,其实是宗教。理性的哲学生产是其理论的外表而已。 p8 In Strauss's view,the modern rationalist philosophy to which most Jewish thinkers was faced with a gradual devastation due to the wave of thought that was conquering every sphere of tra...
评分leo strauss所强调的,其实是宗教。理性的哲学生产是其理论的外表而已。 p8 In Strauss's view,the modern rationalist philosophy to which most Jewish thinkers was faced with a gradual devastation due to the wave of thought that was conquering every sphere of tra...
评分leo strauss所强调的,其实是宗教。理性的哲学生产是其理论的外表而已。 p8 In Strauss's view,the modern rationalist philosophy to which most Jewish thinkers was faced with a gradual devastation due to the wave of thought that was conquering every sphere of tra...
评分leo strauss所强调的,其实是宗教。理性的哲学生产是其理论的外表而已。 p8 In Strauss's view,the modern rationalist philosophy to which most Jewish thinkers was faced with a gradual devastation due to the wave of thought that was conquering every sphere of tra...
评分leo strauss所强调的,其实是宗教。理性的哲学生产是其理论的外表而已。 p8 In Strauss's view,the modern rationalist philosophy to which most Jewish thinkers was faced with a gradual devastation due to the wave of thought that was conquering every sphere of tra...
Jewish Philosophy and the Crisis of Modernity pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载 2024