The Structure of Scientific Revolutions pdf epub mobi txt 電子書下載2025

☆☆☆☆☆

Thomas Samuel Kuhn (surname pronounced /ˈkuːn/; July 18, 1922 – June 17, 1996) was an American physicist who wrote extensively on the history of science and developed several important notions in the sociology and philosophy of science.

出版者:University Of Chicago Press

作者:Thomas S. Kuhn

出品人:

頁數:212

译者:

出版時間:1996-12-15

價格:USD 13.00

裝幀:Paperback

isbn號碼:9780226458083

叢書系列:

圖書標籤:

科學哲學
哲學
科學
Kuhn
科普
Scientific
Revolutions
Structure

下載連結在頁面底部

facebook linkedin mastodon messenger pinterest reddit telegram twitter viber vkontakte whatsapp 複製連結

想要找書就要到小美書屋

book.quotespace.org

立刻按 ctrl+D收藏本頁

你會得到大驚喜!!

Since the publication of this book in 1962, Kuhn's writings (and many of his ideas, such as "paradigm shift") have been highly influential in academic and popular discourse. This book is must-reading for anyone studying the history and philosophy of science specifically, or cultural or technological change generally.

Since Kuhn does not permit truth to be a criterion of scientific theories, he would presumably not claim his own theory to be true. But if causing a revolution is the hallmark of a superior paradigm, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions has been a resounding success.

具體描述

讀後感

評分☆☆☆☆☆

庫恩在該書中提出了一個重要的中心觀念，即所謂“典範”（paradigm）。Paradigm的觀念是庫恩從維特根斯坦的wittgenstein那裡借來的。根據庫恩的理論，一切科學革命都必然要基本上牽涉到所謂“典範”的改變。簡單的說，“典範”可以有廣義狹義二義：廣義指一門科學研究中的全...

評分☆☆☆☆☆

常在自然科学、社会科学当中看到范式一词，那么范式究竟是什么意思呢？本文旨在探讨自然科学中范式的概念。最早提出自然科学提出范式一词的人是科学哲学家托马斯·库恩（Thomas Kunn) 提出并在《科学革命的结构》(The Structure of Scientific Revolutions)（１９６２）中系...

評分☆☆☆☆☆

【摘要】此文为T.S.的《科学革命的结构》发表50周年之际，加拿大哲学家I.哈金(Ian Hacking)为其第4版撰写的《导读》，旨在既介绍当年此书发表时所引发的效应和争论，也对半个世纪后的今天，如何看待它所提出的问题和存在的影响作出评论。因此，这一"导读"兼具导读和评论的双重...

評分☆☆☆☆☆

前言：我作为一个业余逼格提升爱好者，杂七杂八地读了一些科学哲学文章，并粗略地通读了托马斯•库恩的里程碑式著作《科学革命的结构》。恰逢所里也有人对此也有兴趣，姑且写点自己对这本书的理解，权当抛砖引玉。文中难免有偏颇疏漏之处，大家见谅。托马斯•库恩所著...

用戶評價

评分☆☆☆☆☆

paradigms are incommensurable iff they are incommensurable, which leads to the so-called irrationality in the change of perception??? well on the other hand you've also acknowledged how contemporary paradigms are more refined and away from errors?? where does the criteria lie in here...

评分☆☆☆☆☆

2011Fall TA

评分☆☆☆☆☆

Jan 2016二刷，簡直不知道兩年前自己一刷這本書的時候到底在看什麼。

评分☆☆☆☆☆

~~~

评分☆☆☆☆☆

讀的睡不著覺，或者是因為想那些問題睡不著纔讀的