In a rented convent in Santa Fe, a revolution has been brewing. The activists are not anarchists, but rather Nobel Laureates in physics and economics such as Murray Gell-Mann and Kenneth Arrow, and pony-tailed graduate students, mathematicians, and computer scientists down from Los Alamos. They've formed an iconoclastic think tank called the Santa Fe Institute, and their radical idea is to create a new science called complexity. These mavericks from academe share a deep impatience with the kind of linear, reductionist thinking that has dominated science since the time of Newton. Instead, they are gathering novel ideas about interconnectedness, coevolution, chaos, structure, and order - and they're forging them into an entirely new, unified way of thinking about nature, human social behavior, life, and the universe itself. They want to know how a primordial soup of simple molecules managed to turn itself into the first living cell - and what the origin of life some four billion years ago can tell us about the process of technological innovation today. They want to know why ancient ecosystems often remained stable for millions of years, only to vanish in a geological instant - and what such events have to do with the sudden collapse of Soviet communism in the late 1980s. They want to know why the economy can behave in unpredictable ways that economists can't explain - and how the random process of Darwinian natural selection managed to produce such wonderfully intricate structures as the eye and the kidney. Above all, they want to know how the universe manages to bring forth complex structures such as galaxies, stars, planets, bacteria, plants, animals, and brains. There are commonthreads in all of these queries, and these Santa Fe scientists seek to understand them. Complexity is their story: the messy, funny, human story of how science really happens. Here is the tale of Brian Arthur, the Belfast-born economist who stubbornly pushed his theories of economic ch
桑塔费笔记1苦行僧的粗布衣服 李华芳 “苦行僧的粗布衣服”是《复杂》的最后一章中的一个标题,目前,我的想法也真是苦行僧一样的自我摸索,我模糊的感到头脑里有一种想法正在清晰,只差一点点我就可以抓到它了。这就是我目前的情况。我的想法最早是从coase那里来的,命令作...
评分《复杂》这本书的出版可以说给中国的学术界打开了一扇窗子,让我们真正的了解了国外的复杂性科学。有人称《复杂》这本书是复杂性科学的“圣经”我看也一点不为过。《复杂》类似于纪实小说,读起来轻松愉快,然而这也许会让不熟悉的人摸不到头脑,因为单单从每一章的标题根...
评分大学的时候,放弃其他的专业,选择化学,其原因是对 化学中那奇妙的反应着迷,想去了解。 普利高津的耗散理论,熵。 这个世界到底是会变成什么样呢? 岁月流逝,当时的激情已然不再,化学也离我远去。 看了复杂这本书,又让我感觉回到当时对这个世界的事务那种追求理解的年代...
评分花了两三个小时浏览完了这本书,简单评价一下: 这是一本传记性质的书,作为传记,写得非常精彩,译者译笔也非常传神。但如果任何人想要从中获得有价值的科学理论,那还是找两本专业的书来看看吧。整个这本书对于理论的描述是非常大而化之的(如果还不能算不靠谱的话),泛泛...
评分《复杂》这本书的出版可以说给中国的学术界打开了一扇窗子,让我们真正的了解了国外的复杂性科学。有人称《复杂》这本书是复杂性科学的“圣经”我看也一点不为过。《复杂》类似于纪实小说,读起来轻松愉快,然而这也许会让不熟悉的人摸不到头脑,因为单单从每一章的标题根...
研究复杂系统的先驱们的故事
评分相遇总比相守来的奇幻,恋爱总比婚姻来的耐看。本书如果只停留在artificial life的struggling之前,即santa fe形成之时,会更加多彩。后面对Langton经历的细致描画,虽然是励志是奇迹,却开始偏离主线。接下来对institute经费紧张等行政状况记录,更加是柴米油盐酱醋茶。不能说不好,只是有些添足。 好吧,作为混沌与秩序之间,这样的复杂可能就是作者想达成的效果吧。
评分精彩至极。
评分是一本叙述性的书,不过这种题材不是我的胃口。我喜欢直接去讲宇宙的道理。不过,这本书的有些内容,确实有enlight的作用,比如increaing return, network等。我非常建议,看看。
评分let me think of something about city, what we talk about the city in 1960 is more like something this book related to
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有