柯律格(Craig Clunas)1954年齣生於英國蘇格蘭阿伯丁,現任英國牛津大學藝術史係講座教授,曾任倫敦維多利亞與艾伯特博物館(Victoria & Albert Museum)中國部資深研究員兼策展人15年,並自1994年起先後執教於薩塞剋斯大學(University of Sussex)藝術史係及倫敦大學亞非學院(SOAS)。柯律格是當前從物質文化角度研究中國文明史的重要學者,自1991年起陸續齣版《長物:早期現代中國的物質文化與社會狀況》(Superfluous Things: Material Culture and Social Status in Early Modern China, 1991)、《豐饒之地:明代中國的園林文化》(Fruitful Sites: Garden Culture in Ming Dynasty China, 1996)、《早期現代中國的圖畫與視覺性》(Pictures and Visuality in Early Modern China, 1997)、《中國藝術》(Art in China, 1997)及《雅債:文徵明的社交性藝術》(Elegant Debts; the Social Art of Wen Zhengming, 1470-1559 , 2004)、《大明帝國:明代中國的視覺和物質文化》(Empire of Great Brightness: Visual and Material Cultures of Ming China, 1368-1644, 2007)等書。
In the book Superfluous Things Clunas suggests that the when studying a material thing, people always do it in a positivism way instead of treat it as a symbolic language to convey the message about society. Material culture of things is always neglected. I...
評分In the book Superfluous Things Clunas suggests that the when studying a material thing, people always do it in a positivism way instead of treat it as a symbolic language to convey the message about society. Material culture of things is always neglected. I...
評分可又名“我用布迪厄之眼审晚明中国”,整本书其实都在说一个事:即明代士绅如何用“长物”来应对身份认同的焦虑。但由于书中没有任何对明代士绅的阶层变动的讨论,也缺乏令人信服的物在不同阶层的样本之间的深入比较,使得作者引用的诸多“长物”难以真正进入晚明情境,也让本...
評分Between painting proper and visuality in general, “things” lie in between. They exist in material forms, in discourse, in imagination, and in mobility. Drawing from Zhangwu zhi by Wen Zhenheng, Clunas depicts a general picture of things in mainly late Min...
評分克鲁纳斯教授从明代文震亨的《长物志》入手,从物质文化的角度介入中国古代艺术史的研究,并把明代定义为中国前现代社会。书中一反常规美术史过分依赖卷轴画作为研究对象的作法,把研究的领域扩展到整个视觉文化,大量引用明代的小说、文集以及版画,在上世纪90年代中期,克鲁...
It is about some of the ways of looking at things in the China of latter part of the Ming dynasty. The work of this research introduced to a wide audience the concept of a system of goods as a symbolic language, a way of sending and receiving messages about society and about an individual’s place within.
评分來自西方消費文化的反觀、文本細讀的方法、中西研究視角的微調等,算是柯真正在做藝術史的一本~
评分cultural history/material culture和art history差得好遠...
评分藉鑒西方物質文化史的觀點與取經,尤其是布爾迪厄關於distinction的觀點,探討晚明精英如何在商品化的大潮下利用藝術品鑒賞來維持自身精英地位,從而與那些暴發戶相區彆。
评分好書
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美書屋 版权所有