具体描述
Why can’t our political leaders work together as threats loom and problems mount? Why do people so readily assume the worst about the motives of their fellow citizens? In The Righteous Mind, social psychologist Jonathan Haidt explores the origins of our divisions and points the way forward to mutual understanding.
His starting point is moral intuition—the nearly instantaneous perceptions we all have about other people and the things they do. These intuitions feel like self-evident truths, making us righteously certain that those who see things differently are wrong. Haidt shows us how these intuitions differ across cultures, including the cultures of the political left and right. He blends his own research findings with those of anthropologists, historians, and other psychologists to draw a map of the moral domain, and he explains why conservatives can navigate that map more skillfully than can liberals. He then examines the origins of morality, overturning the view that evolution made us fundamentally selfish creatures. But rather than arguing that we are innately altruistic, he makes a more subtle claim—that we are fundamentally groupish. It is our groupishness, he explains, that leads to our greatest joys, our religious divisions, and our political affiliations. In a stunning final chapter on ideology and civility, Haidt shows what each side is right about, and why we need the insights of liberals, conservatives, and libertarians to flourish as a nation.
作者简介
Johathan Haidt is the Thomas Cooley Professor of Ethical Leadership at New York University's Stern School of Business. He is the author of The Happiness Hypothesis: Finding Modern Truth in Ancient Wisdom. He lives in New York City.
目录信息
读后感
作为当前道德心理学研究的大牛之一，Haidt把自己近20年在道德心理学的研究成果——道德基础理论——总结出来，并从政治心理学的角度来阐发出来，非常有助于理解人类道德行为。 书中提到第六个道德基础，是颇有政治意味的平等，这个可能与Haidt本人由心理学系转移到NYU的商学院...
评分（一） 本书属于心理学的书，也被归于哲学类书。这种分类方式是很有意思。心理学的结论应该是事实判断。而正义不是事实判断，是道德判断。 本书的结论是骑象人之喻：是非之心来源于感情，而理性是为感情寻找理由。即人类在判断是非是，由感性给出结论，再由理性为什么是这个结...
评分 评分“我们注定得生活在这里，却为什么不能好好相处？”这是美国黑人Rodney King在遭到4名洛杉矶警察殴打1年后对媒体发出的一句家喻户晓的呼吁，也是作者在开篇提出的一个问题。 我们日常生活和工作中也经常碰到类似的困境。为什么夫妻会因为一些所谓“小事和琐事”大吵一...
评分还记得骇客帝国里面尼奥的选择吗？红色药片和蓝色药片，一个是真实的世界，一个是熟悉的世界。他选择了红色药片。 这本书的作者乔纳森说，“施韦德的著作的确是我的红色药片。”我想说的是，这本涵盖施韦德关于道德理论的书是我的红色药片。 帮助我看看清了一个真实的“道德”...
用户评价
看起来挺时髦的。看了一些吐槽，不打算很仔细地看。（又一个对道金斯的错误引用wwww)【真的，这里面举得例子怎么总觉得作者看的材料和我看的材料不是一个材料。这导致很多论点都很没说服力。完了最后一点宗教那边的论述就更乱来了，切掉最后一点还能拯救一下
评分很好地介绍了 Moral Foundations Theory，刷新了我对道德的理解！
评分在整体故事架构上比happiness hypotheses 做得更好 结尾居然用了 yin & yang。不靠谱一段是引用 控制成品油的铅含量导致美国犯罪率下降，不太严禁。各种说法，主流说法是枪支控制 魔鬼经济学说是堕胎合法。
评分Do you need to be so long-winded in order to "talk to the elephant"? Liberal - harm/care, fairness, liberation/oppression. Republicans plus authority, sanctity, loyalty
评分“Anyone who values truth should stop worshipping reason.” “People bind themselves into political teams that share moral narratives. Once they accept a particular narrative, they become blind to alternative moral worlds.”
相关图书
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息，本站不存储任何数据与内容，任何内容与数据均与本站无关，如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有