具体描述
Why can’t our political leaders work together as threats loom and problems mount? Why do people so readily assume the worst about the motives of their fellow citizens? In The Righteous Mind, social psychologist Jonathan Haidt explores the origins of our divisions and points the way forward to mutual understanding.
His starting point is moral intuition—the nearly instantaneous perceptions we all have about other people and the things they do. These intuitions feel like self-evident truths, making us righteously certain that those who see things differently are wrong. Haidt shows us how these intuitions differ across cultures, including the cultures of the political left and right. He blends his own research findings with those of anthropologists, historians, and other psychologists to draw a map of the moral domain, and he explains why conservatives can navigate that map more skillfully than can liberals. He then examines the origins of morality, overturning the view that evolution made us fundamentally selfish creatures. But rather than arguing that we are innately altruistic, he makes a more subtle claim—that we are fundamentally groupish. It is our groupishness, he explains, that leads to our greatest joys, our religious divisions, and our political affiliations. In a stunning final chapter on ideology and civility, Haidt shows what each side is right about, and why we need the insights of liberals, conservatives, and libertarians to flourish as a nation.
作者简介
Johathan Haidt is the Thomas Cooley Professor of Ethical Leadership at New York University's Stern School of Business. He is the author of The Happiness Hypothesis: Finding Modern Truth in Ancient Wisdom. He lives in New York City.
目录信息
读后感
《正义之心》是一本极具说服力的书。它的极具说服力并非是因为作者在书中建构了一套极其精密无可挑剔的理论体系，而是因为作者深谙直觉主义式的劝服之道，即如果想要改变一个人对某事某物的看法，必须对着他的直觉说话。因此，作者并未开门见山，一开始就论述其核心发现，而是...
评分作为当前道德心理学研究的大牛之一，Haidt把自己近20年在道德心理学的研究成果——道德基础理论——总结出来，并从政治心理学的角度来阐发出来，非常有助于理解人类道德行为。 书中提到第六个道德基础，是颇有政治意味的平等，这个可能与Haidt本人由心理学系转移到NYU的商学院...
评分 评分（一） 本书属于心理学的书，也被归于哲学类书。这种分类方式是很有意思。心理学的结论应该是事实判断。而正义不是事实判断，是道德判断。 本书的结论是骑象人之喻：是非之心来源于感情，而理性是为感情寻找理由。即人类在判断是非是，由感性给出结论，再由理性为什么是这个结...
评分用户评价
Sexist + 伪科学 + 伪装成客观评价但是在用词上各种暗示
评分很好地介绍了 Moral Foundations Theory，刷新了我对道德的理解！
评分能够抛弃成见听进去别人在说什么并且understanding多难得啊，生活中见到大多数人都只能听进去符合自己想法的话。这世界也越来越segregate，越来越多的人只与同类人打交道。对文中提到liberal对conservative的理解太少太少真是深有同感，我们自以为包容，其实有吗？
评分先看John Jost的书评再看书，看的时候也时时怀疑自己不够客观， 感觉自己一直看到论证不太严谨的地方。作者和书评人都恰好在NYU，对两人的直观印象成为了阅读的背景。认真写完书评和笔记后再来重读一遍Jost的书评吧，也许可以再写一篇回应书评的评论。
评分三個核心理念：好惡，先有直覺，再有論證；人性，既有自私，也有「群私」；道德，一邊約束，一邊障目。用進化生物學的理論提出道德和宗教來由的假說，這部分我只能「呵呵」，但對於人性（無法完全理性）的論述，以及道德的六個根基/維度，這些思考卻是蠻開腦洞的。作者作為無神論、崇尚自由的左派人士，真誠良善地願意站到光譜另一極思考，的確是為數不多的開明之士，放在當今撕裂的社會，相當抵讚。四星。
相关图书
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息，本站不存储任何数据与内容，任何内容与数据均与本站无关，如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有