 
			 
				What can we learn about the Chinese revolution by placing a doubly marginalized group--rural women--at the center of the inquiry? In this book, Gail Hershatter explores changes in the lives of seventy-two elderly women in rural Shaanxi province during the revolutionary decades of the 1950s and 1960s. Interweaving these women's life histories with insightful analysis, Hershatter shows how Party-state policy became local and personal, and how it affected women's agricultural work, domestic routines, activism, marriage, childbirth, and parenting--even their notions of virtue and respectability. The women narrate their pasts from the vantage point of the present and highlight their enduring virtues, important achievements, and most deeply harbored grievances. In showing what memories can tell us about gender as an axis of power, difference, and collectivity in 1950s rural China and the present, Hershatter powerfully examines the nature of socialism and how gender figured in its creation.
贺萧(Gail Hershatter),曾求学于美国汉普郡学院、中国南开大学、美国斯坦福大学,获斯坦福大学博士学位,曾任美国亚洲研究学会主席,现为加州大学圣克鲁斯分校历史系自身讲座教授。著有《天津工人,1900-1949》,《个人的声音:20世纪80年代的中国妇女》,《危险的愉悦:20世纪上海的娼妓问题和现代性》,《中国妇女在漫长的20世纪》,《记忆的性别:农村妇女和中国集体化历史》等。
2017年春天Mullaney的Chinese Intellectual and Cultural History课上交的response essay。 Through numerous interviews of village women and local cadres in several counties of Shaanxi, Hershatter garnered a significant amount of primary sources that enabled her...
评分分享提纲: 1.口述史的方法论辨析——优点:最大程度上解决社会史史料的不足;平民化的视角;小人物的生平记录;生动与鲜活性——缺点:跟记忆的状况紧密相连,存在伪饰、模糊和重构的极大可能;国家意识形态与社会集体认同对于个人记忆的再造;个人记忆与表达之间的偏差(迫于...
评分 评分Gendered memory During the first decade after the establishment of PRC, various ambitious policies were enacted and implemented. However, other than the numbing official records and dossiers, the response to these governmental initiatives from the society ...
评分20世纪五六十年代,集体化给中国农村带来了巨大变化,后世著作也对此多有研究论述。然而,中国女性,特别是农村女性,却对此鲜有发声。本书开创性地从性别研究和集体记忆的角度切入了中国当代史研究。作者用历时15年收集的口述史资料,向我们描述了陕西省某农村的72位老年妇女...
研究Gendered History以及相关领域的问题,视角已经被默认为Female Perspective(就像History被默认为Male一般),因此在理论到位材料裁剪得当的情况下,拼的就是谁更会讲故事,而这又往往和学术无关,只和文笔有关——“中国农村女人最惨,男人都是压迫女人的沙猪”,即便这不是真相,那离真相有有多远(近)?
评分一定要看啊!
评分是整個seminar公認一學期中讀過的最好的書 用女性口述史講述中國的革命 記憶有性別嗎?歷史有性別嗎?Propoganda如何潛入、塑造主體性?女性如何建構自身與公共空間、私人空間的關係?
评分1. local history: socialism is local(state-society) 2. gender history: the gendered framework of memory, narrative, and revolution 2. oral history: interviewer is a co-producer of history
评分补标。I want to see the gender of memory in this age.
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有