At the heart of representative government is the question: "What makes government and its agents legitimate authorities?" The notion of consent to a social contract between the citizen and his government is central to this problem. What are the functions of public authority? What are the people's rights in a self-governing and representative state? Patrick Riley presents a comprehensive historical analysis of the meaning of contract theory and a testing of the inherent validity of the ideas of consent and obligation. He uncovers the critical relationship between the act of willing and that of consenting in self-government and shows how "will" relates to political legitimacy. His is the first large-scale study of social contract theory from Hobbes to Rawls that gives "will" the central place it occupies in contractarian thinking.
評分
評分
評分
評分
Only read the parts of Hobbes, Rousseau, Locke and Kant. He pointed out where the difficulties are, but not so helpful for me personally.
评分從意誌切入,把握住瞭契約論傳統的核心優勢與軟肋
评分Only read the parts of Hobbes, Rousseau, Locke and Kant. He pointed out where the difficulties are, but not so helpful for me personally. @2017-05-15 20:56:20
评分@2015-05-15
评分從意誌切入,把握住瞭契約論傳統的核心優勢與軟肋
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美書屋 版权所有