Richard Wolin is Distinguished Professor of History, Comparative Literature, and Political Science at the City University of New York Graduate Center. His books, which include Heidegger's Children and The Seduction of Unreason (both Princeton), have been translated into ten languages. His articles and reviews have appeared in Dissent, the Nation, and the New Republic.
Michel Foucault, Jean-Paul Sartre, Julia Kristeva, Phillipe Sollers, and Jean-Luc Godard. During the 1960s, a who's who of French thinkers, writers, and artists, spurred by China's Cultural Revolution, were seized with a fascination for Maoism. Combining a merciless exposé of left-wing political folly and cross-cultural misunderstanding with a spirited defense of the 1960s, The Wind from the East tells the colorful story of this legendary period in France. Richard Wolin shows how French students and intellectuals, inspired by their perceptions of the Cultural Revolution, and motivated by utopian hopes, incited grassroots social movements and reinvigorated French civic and cultural life.
Wolin's riveting narrative reveals that Maoism's allure among France's best and brightest actually had little to do with a real understanding of Chinese politics. Instead, it paradoxically served as a vehicle for an emancipatory transformation of French society. French student leftists took up the trope of "cultural revolution," applying it to their criticisms of everyday life. Wolin examines how Maoism captured the imaginations of France's leading cultural figures, influencing Sartre's "perfect Maoist moment"; Foucault's conception of power; Sollers's chic, leftist intellectual journal Tel Quel; as well as Kristeva's book on Chinese women--which included a vigorous defense of foot-binding.
Recounting the cultural and political odyssey of French students and intellectuals in the 1960s, The Wind from the East illustrates how the Maoist phenomenon unexpectedly sparked a democratic political sea change in France.
有一段时期,对1968年五月巴黎左翼运动的反思几乎成为当代法国知识分子的必修课。可以说,以“五月精神”为坐标轴,摆置自己的思想归属,是他们的一次站队表态。回过头来看,1968年后的每一个十年都或多或少掀起新的反思。单是一头扎进法国当代思想史这个万花筒,就可以看清法...
评分这本书反复将共产主义和人道主义对立,比如说福柯领悟到人道主义更为重要,由此脱离左派运动等等。 这种对立貌似很有道理,但实际上法国左派运动号召知识分子进工厂做工等等,这也应当被视作某种人道主义行为吧。 我认为共产主义跟人道主义有不少重叠交叉地方。 作者假如要把两...
评分和作者观点差异很大,四星完全是因为他对六七十年代的法国毛主义做了细致的梳理。 后面朱特的推荐语说这本书“审慎公正”,个人并不赞同。详实细致可以,但说这本书“公正”并不合适。它的情感色彩、意识形态倾向非常明显不加掩饰,我对这种写法没意见,但显然不能用“审慎公正...
评分有一段时期,对1968年五月巴黎左翼运动的反思几乎成为当代法国知识分子的必修课。可以说,以“五月精神”为坐标轴,摆置自己的思想归属,是他们的一次站队表态。回过头来看,1968年后的每一个十年都或多或少掀起新的反思。单是一头扎进法国当代思想史这个万花筒,就可以看清法...
评分和作者观点差异很大,四星完全是因为他对六七十年代的法国毛主义做了细致的梳理。 后面朱特的推荐语说这本书“审慎公正”,个人并不赞同。详实细致可以,但说这本书“公正”并不合适。它的情感色彩、意识形态倾向非常明显不加掩饰,我对这种写法没意见,但显然不能用“审慎公正...
三星半吧,其实论点不是很有新意,尤其前面法国政治部分属于老生常谈,后面七十年代跟自己关系不大没有细读。只能说我没有找到我想找的东西。
评分有种读得莫名其妙的感觉
评分老生常谈了
评分好看
评分Roots and legacy of French student unrest in 1968. Maoism in French intellectual creation
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有