This book is a comparative study of imperial organization and longevity that assesses Ottoman successes as well as failures against those of other empires with similar characteristics. Barkey examines the Ottoman Empire's social organization and mechanisms of rule at key moments of its history, emergence, imperial institutionalization, remodeling, and transition to nation-state, revealing how the empire managed these moments, adapted, and averted crises and what changes made it transform dramatically. The flexible techniques by which the Ottomans maintained their legitimacy, the cooperation of their diverse elites both at the center and in the provinces, as well as their control over economic and human resources were responsible for the longevity of this particular 'negotiated empire'. Her analysis illuminates topics that include imperial governance, imperial institutions, imperial diversity and multiculturalism, the manner in which dissent is handled and/or internalized, and the nature of state society negotiations.
• Views the Ottoman empire in a comparative perspective • Combines social science methodology with a strong sense of historical perspective
• Covers a wide range of topics, including imperial governance, institutions, diversity and multiculturalism, and conflict resolution
具体描述
读后感
评分
评分
评分
评分
用户评价
制度主义、结构主义与社会网分析
评分制度主义、结构主义与社会网分析
评分longevity and durability of empire；没读完，但对于一套网络分析从inland empire用到colony empire再拉上US empire总觉得理论化得有点危险（不针对本书内容）
评分不错的书，社会学家在引用二手文献基础之上对奥斯曼帝国历史的再解释，主要分析了帝国如何运用各种手段整合多种力量，形成一种灵活的、有高度适应性的spoke-and-hub权力体系，实现了相对的长治久安，不过作者也指出，让帝国得以整合的力量最终也害了帝国。这书真正的江湖地位来自于后三分之一，作者“转型”的叙事挑战了长期主导奥斯曼帝国史研究的“衰落”叙事，并强调了地方显贵在其中的作用，这对后一代学者（比如Ali Yaycioglu）产生了相当的影响，然而正如楼上友邻吐槽的那样，前三分之二，也就是讲帝国整合各种力量的那部分，并没有讲出什么新东西嘛......并且，这书没有一手材料，基本都是引用二手研究成果，作者说了她只是选取部分成果，但是始终没有说自己是怎么选择的...
评分制度主义、结构主义与社会网分析
相关图书
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息，本站不存储任何数据与内容，任何内容与数据均与本站无关，如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有