Irving Fisher (1867-1947)
Irving Fisher was one of America's greatest mathematical economists and one of the clearest economics writers of all time. He had the intellect to use mathematics in virtually all his theories and the good sense to introduce it only after he had clearly explained the central principles in words. And he explained very well. Fisher's Theory of Interest is written so clearly that graduate economics students, who still study it today, often find that they can read—and understand—half the book in one sitting. With other writings in technical economics, this is unheard of.
Although he damaged his reputation by insisting throughout the Great Depression that recovery was imminent, contemporary economic models of interest and capital are based on Fisherian principles. Similarly, monetarism is founded on Fisher's principles of money and prices.
Fisher called interest "an index of a community's preference for a dollar of present [income] over a dollar of future income." He labeled his theory of interest the "impatience and opportunity" theory. Interest rates, Fisher postulated, result from the interaction of two forces: the "time preference" people have for capital now, and the investment opportunity principle (that income invested now will yield greater income in the future). This reasoning sounds very much like B鰄m-Bawerk's. Indeed, Fisher's Theory of Interest was dedicated to "the memory of John Rae and of Eugen von B鰄m-Bawerk, who laid the foundations upon which I have endeavored to build." But Fisher objected to B鰄m-Bawerk's idea that roundaboutness necessarily increases production. Instead, argued Fisher, at a positive interest rate, no one would ever choose a longer period unless it were more productive. So if we look at processes selected, we do find that longer periods are more productive. But, he argued, the length of the period does not in itself contribute to productivity.
Fisher defined capital as any asset that produces a flow of income over time. A flow of income, said Fisher, was distinct from the stock of capital that generated it. Capital and income are linked by the interest rate. Specifically, wrote Fisher, the value of capital is the present value of the flow of (net) income that the asset generates. This still is how economists think about capital and income today.
Fisher also opposed conventional income taxation and favored a tax on consumption to replace it. His position followed directly from his capital theory. When people save out of current income and then use the savings to invest in capital goods that yield income later, noted Fisher, they are being taxed on the income that they used to buy the capital goods and then are being taxed later on the income that the capital generates. This, he said, is double taxation of saving, and biases the tax code against saving and in favor of consumption. Fisher's reasoning is still used by economists today in making the case for consumption taxes.
Fisher was a pioneer in the construction and use of price indexes. James Tobin of Yale has called Fisher "the greatest expert of all time on index numbers." Indeed, from 1923 to 1936, his own Index Number Institute computed price indexes from all over the world.
Fisher was also the first economist to distinguish clearly between real and nominal interest rates. He pointed out that the real interest rate is equal to the nominal interest rate (the one we observe) minus the expected inflation rate. If the nominal interest rate is 12 percent, for example, but people expect inflation of 7 percent, then the real interest rate is only 5 percent. Again, this is still the basic understanding of modern economists.
Fisher laid out a more modern quantity theory of money (i.e., monetarism) than had been done before. He formulated his theory in terms of the Equation of Exchange, which says that MV = PT, where M equals the stock of money; V equals velocity, or how quickly money circulates in an economy; P equals the price level; and T equals the total volume of transactions. Again, modern economists still draw on this equation, although they usually use the version MV = Py, where y stands for real income.
The equation can be a very powerful tool for checking the consistency of one's thinking about the economy. Indeed, Reagan economist Beryl Sprinkel, who was Treasury undersecretary for monetary affairs in 1981, used this equation to criticize his colleague David Stockman's economic forecasts. Sprinkel pointed out that the only way Stockman's assumptions about the growth of income, the inflation rate, and the growth of the money supply could prove true would be if velocity increased faster than it ever had before. As it turned out, velocity actually declined.
Irving Fisher was born in upstate New York in 1867. He gained an eclectic education at Yale, studying science and philosophy. He published poetry and works on astronomy, mechanics, and geometry. But his greatest concentration was on mathematics and economics, the latter having no academic department at Yale. Nonetheless, Fisher earned the first Ph.D. in economics ever awarded by Yale. Upon graduation he stayed at Yale for the rest of his career.
A three-year struggle with tuberculosis beginning in 1898 left Fisher with a profound interest in health and hygiene. He took up vegetarianism and exercise and wrote a national best-seller titled How to Live: Rules for Healthful Living Based on Modern Science, whose value he demonstrated by living until age eighty. He campaigned for Prohibition, peace, and eugenics. He was founder or president of numerous associations and agencies, including the Econometric Society and the American Economic Association. He was also a successful inventor. In 1925 his firm, which held the patent on his "visible card index" system, merged with its main competitor to form what later was known as Remington Rand and then Sperry Rand. Although the merger made him very wealthy, he lost a large part of his wealth in the stock market crash of 1929.
Selected Works
The Nature of Capital and Income. 1906.
The Purchasing Power of Money. 1911.
The Purchasing Power of Money, new and revised edition, 1922.
The Rate of Interest. 1907.
The Theory of Interest. 1930.
"Dollar Stabilization." Encyclopedia Britannica. vol. XXX, pp. 852-853. 1921.
我之所以看这本书,是受了张五常的影响,他总是在他的著作里说这本书好,好称是他最欣赏的四本书之一,我比较好奇就看了,我还是比较庸俗,崇拜名人。 看了之后,我大受打击,我明白了,像我这样的人这辈子是做不了理论的,还是安心做我的本职工作吧。其实做工科的人都是接触...
评分看到张五常的推荐,买了费雪的《利息理论》来看,对于已经具备经济学基础的我来说,这本书并没有什么难度,看这本书更大的意义在于学习费雪严谨的理论研究方法,或许张五常也是这个意思吧。本书让人震撼的地方在于如同教科书般的严谨和逻辑,思维发散却没有天马行空,理论的文...
评分 评分我之所以看这本书,是受了张五常的影响,他总是在他的著作里说这本书好,好称是他最欣赏的四本书之一,我比较好奇就看了,我还是比较庸俗,崇拜名人。 看了之后,我大受打击,我明白了,像我这样的人这辈子是做不了理论的,还是安心做我的本职工作吧。其实做工科的人都是接触...
评分关于LPR的选择,之前写了篇短文,其中提到,如果看好中国经济,LPR肯定向下,所以换成LPR肯定是有利的。当时以资本逐利来进行解释:经济向好,实体经济活跃,投资回报率高,资本追逐高回报,利率自然向下。其实解释得很牵强,完全没有把内在逻辑说清楚。 在经济学的框架里,利...
从教学法的角度来看,这本书的编排顺序堪称教科书级别的典范,但对于自学者来说,可能需要一位“向导”。它的章节递进逻辑是无可挑剔的,从最基础的概念出发,层层深入,确保每一个新的知识点都建立在前一个知识点的牢固基础之上。这种严谨性意味着它几乎不可能被跳读。你不能只挑选你感兴趣的那几章来读,因为后面的内容会明确地引用前面章节的定义和定理。对于一个在课堂上听课的学生来说,这无疑是最好的安排,老师可以控制学习的节奏。但对于像我这样选择自学的读者,这意味着我必须严格按照目录的顺序,一步一个脚印地往前走,而且需要极大的自律性来维持这种持续的投入。它很少使用脚注来提供背景信息或历史沿革,更多的是专注于数学推导本身,这使得它的内容密度极高,缺乏一些让人放松下来的“喘息”空间。
评分这本书的封面设计,嗯,说实话,第一眼看下去,感觉它自带一种老派的、学术的庄重感。那种深沉的色调,配上略显硬朗的字体,立刻就让人明白这不是一本轻松的读物。我当时是在图书馆的某个角落里翻到的,它静静地躺在那里,与其他那些封面花哨、主打快速阅读的书籍形成了鲜明的对比。拿起它的手感也相当扎实,纸张的质地似乎也在无声地宣示着其内容的厚重性。我猜想,作者一定是在这个领域浸淫了极深,才能以如此沉稳的姿态来呈现他的思想。这不仅仅是一本书,它更像是一份严谨的学术宣言,让人在翻开扉页之前,就已经对即将踏入的知识领域心生敬畏。它没有试图用任何新潮的营销手段来吸引眼球,它的吸引力完全来自于其内在的学术光环,这在如今这个信息爆炸的时代,显得尤为难得和可贵。我花了些时间来适应这种略显古朴的包装,但一旦接受了它所代表的专业性,便觉得这种“老派”反而成了一种品质的保证,让人对其中蕴含的知识体系充满了期待。
评分这本书的价值,我认为,更多地体现在其思想的“沉淀”而非“时效性”上。市面上关于金融和风险分析的书籍更新速度极快,今天还流行的模型,明天可能就被更先进的算法所取代。然而,这本书所奠定的那些核心数学和逻辑基础,却是穿越时间考验的。它探讨的是事物运行的本质规律,是驱动金融世界的底层引擎。当你读完之后,你会发现很多新近出现的复杂工具,其推导过程和内在逻辑,最终都能追溯到这本书中阐述的某些基本原理。它给你提供了一个坚实的“锚点”,让你在面对未来层出不穷的新工具和新概念时,不会感到迷失方向,因为你知道一切复杂性最终都源于少数几个清晰、优雅的原始假设。所以,它不是一本教你如何快速赚钱的书,而是一本教你如何深入理解这个领域底层规则的书,这种理解是长久且具有复利效应的。
评分阅读体验上,这本书的行文风格简直就是一场对耐心和专注力的极限考验。它不像那些现代的科普读物那样,时刻准备着给你一个生动的比喻或者一个引人入胜的故事来帮你过渡那些枯燥的公式。恰恰相反,它直截了当地将复杂的逻辑链条完整地呈现在你面前,每一个论证步骤都像是精密的钟表齿轮,咬合得天衣无缝,容不得一丝一毫的跳跃或简化。我记得有几次,为了跟上作者从一个前提推导出下一个结论的飞跃,我不得不反复地后退好几页,重新梳理前面的概念。这强迫你进行一种“主动式”的阅读,你不能指望作者来喂养你,你必须自己去咀嚼、去消化那些抽象的符号和严密的推理。这种阅读过程虽然缓慢且时常伴随着挫败感,但一旦攻克了一个难点,那种豁然开朗的成就感是其他任何娱乐性阅读都无法比拟的。它训练的不是你的记忆力,而是你的逻辑建构能力,这才是它真正的价值所在。
评分如果让我从一个实践者的角度来评价这本书所构建的理论框架,我会说它提供了一个极其坚实但略显“理想化”的基石。书中的模型构建得如此完美,参数设定得如此清晰,仿佛在一个真空、无摩擦的世界中运行。当然,我们都知道现实世界充满了各种不确定性和市场噪音,所以当你试图将书中的理论直接套用到实际的金融产品定价或风险评估中时,你会发现需要进行大量的“修正”和“调整”。这种修正过程,恰恰考验了读者对基础理论的掌握深度。如果基础不牢,你连在哪里需要修正都不知道。这本书的妙处就在于,它不直接告诉你如何应对现实的复杂性,而是让你深刻理解“理想状态”下的运作机制。只有当你完全掌握了那个完美的沙盘模型,你才有资格去讨论如何应对现实世界的“风暴”。它像是为建筑师提供了最完美的结构图纸,而如何根据当地的气候和地质条件进行微调,则是留给读者的后续课题。
评分 评分 评分 评分 评分本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有