Embedded Autonomy pdf epub mobi txt 電子書 下載2025
Peter B. Evans (1944–), Professor of Sociology and the Marjorie Meyer Eliaser Professor of International Studies at the University of California, Berkeley, received his B.A. magna cum laude from Harvard, an M.A. from Oxford University, and an M.A. and Ph.D. from Harvard. He is a political sociologist whose work focuses on the comparative political economy of development and globalization. He has published widely on state-society relations, industrial economic development in Brazil and Latin America, civil society, and international development issues. His work is thus also relevant to the international political economy research literature.
Evans is active in the American Sociological Association's section on Labor and Labor Movements and has served as chair of that section. Also he has worked with the American Comunist Organization in the section of bourgeois opression. He is also a board member of the United Nations Research Institute for Social Development
- 政治學
- 國傢理論
- 政治經濟學
- 社會學
- 比較政治
- 比較政治經濟學
- 鑲嵌性自主
- 工業化
In recent years, debate on the state's economic role has too often devolved into diatribes against intervention. Peter Evans questions such simplistic views, offering a new vision of why state involvement works in some cases and produces disasters in others. To illustrate, he looks at how state agencies, local entrepreneurs, and transnational corporations shaped the emergence of computer industries in Brazil, India, and Korea during the seventies and eighties.
Evans starts with the idea that states vary in the way they are organized and tied to society. In some nations, like Zaire, the state is predatory, ruthlessly extracting and providing nothing of value in return. In others, like Korea, it is developmental, promoting industrial transformation. In still others, like Brazil and India, it is in between, sometimes helping, sometimes hindering. Evans's years of comparative research on the successes and failures of state involvement in the process of industrialization have here been crafted into a persuasive and entertaining work, which demonstrates that successful state action requires an understanding of its own limits, a realistic relationship to the global economy, and the combination of coherent internal organization and close links to society that Evans called "embedded autonomy."
具體描述
讀後感
評分
評分
評分
評分
用戶評價
本書被譽為發展型國傢研究的高峰，Evans不但探討瞭發展型國傢政權內部的狀況，更將目光聚集到國傢與産業、經濟精英的聯係和紐帶上，探討國傢什麼樣的措施能夠促進工業化和經濟趕超。以有效的官僚體製、嵌入型自主性和有選擇的産業政策為核心特徵的“發展型國傢”，是與“掠奪型國傢”相對立的另一種理想類型。
评分not how much but what kind; variations of state involvement depend on variations of state internal structures and state-society relation; predatory and developmental states; corporate coherence and connectedness--embedded autonomy; four rubrics.
评分not how much but what kind; variations of state involvement depend on variations of state internal structures and state-society relation; predatory and developmental states; corporate coherence and connectedness--embedded autonomy; four rubrics.
评分囫圇吞棗啃瞭兩章，以後有空補上其他，文筆真的不錯，句子雖然比較長但是讀兩遍基本都能捋清楚在講什麼（長書評的內容概括地很棒
评分反對“新功利主義”認為國傢天然具有尋租掠奪性和排擠私人資本，主張在工業政策和經濟發展方麵，國傢對社會群體和市場的嵌入，以及國傢的自主性，可以是相互增強補充的：自主性使國傢具有韋伯式“企業國傢/官僚係統”，官僚群體擺脫狹隘社會群體的尋租和俘獲國傢，製定長遠有利的發展目標；嵌入則是成形、固定的同社會群體（主要是私人資本所有者）的聯係，賦予國傢政策閤法性並加強私人參與。不過在此過程中嵌入式自主也會改變和重塑私人資本的政治取嚮和與國傢的關係，且客觀上為資本全球化創造瞭本地夥伴。案例研究是跨國的IT産業政策和發展比較。寫得還不錯，不過大緻論點同發展型國傢無大差彆，隻是加上國傢社會關係的帽子和一些分析而已，且前半部分都是針對國傢與私人投資者關係，最後纔生硬拉上工人階級，為何不一開始就都拉進來呢。
相關圖書
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息，本站不存儲任何數據與內容，任何內容與數據均與本站無關，如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美書屋 版权所有