Against the backdrop of an explosion of interest in new techniques for data collection and theory testing, this volume provides a fresh programmatic statement about comparative-historical analysis. It examines the advances and distinctive contributions that CHA has made to theory generation and the explanation of large-scale outcomes that newer approaches often regard as empirically intractable. An introductory essay locates the sources of CHA's enduring influence in core characteristics that distinguish this approach, such as its attention to process and its commitment to empirically grounded, deep case-based research. Subsequent chapters explore broad research programs inspired by CHA work, new analytic tools for studying temporal processes and institutional dynamics, and recent methodological tools for analyzing sequences and for combining CHA work with other approaches. This volume is essential reading for scholars seeking to learn about the sources of CHA's enduring influence and its contemporary analytical and methodological techniques.
James Mahoney, Northwestern University, Illinois
James Mahoney is Gordon Fulcher Professor in Decision-Making and Professor of Political Science and Sociology at Northwestern University.
Kathleen Thelen, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Kathleen Thelen is Ford Professor of Political Science at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
評分
評分
評分
評分
刷瞭首尾,挺清晰,但還是不懂要怎麼搞CHS
评分刷瞭首尾,挺清晰,但還是不懂要怎麼搞CHS
评分刷瞭首尾,挺清晰,但還是不懂要怎麼搞CHS
评分刷瞭首尾,挺清晰,但還是不懂要怎麼搞CHS
评分與03年的書相比,這本書顯得更為defensive,反映瞭定性研究方法在米國的弱勢地位。這本書在方法上把比較曆史分析局限於曆史製度主義,議題上搞大雜燴,分析工具也沒有多少實質進展。
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美書屋 版权所有