Introducing a remarkable new self-study guide for the law school admission test... The LSAT Trainer. Your LSAT score is the most important part of the law school admissions process. It is far more important than your essays, your recommendations, your GPA, where you went to college, or where you come from. A top LSAT score can open doors for you that would be virtually impossible to open otherwise. Most people are capable of drastically improving their scores with the right preparation. Most people score about the same on the actual exam as they do on their first diagnostic. The LSAT Trainer is the most advanced and effective LSAT learning system ever developed. No other book has ever explained the LSAT with as much depth and clarity, or presented strategies that are as simple, intuitive, and effective. But that's not what makes The LSAT Trainer truly special... Other books are designed to help you understand The LSAT. And that's what we expect our academic books to do. But the LSAT is not a test of what you know. Arguably, a super-smart eighth grader with no advanced training but great reading skills and common sense can get a perfect score on the exam. The LSAT is a test of how you think. The LSAT Trainer is a workbook--it is specifically designed to help you get better and better at thinking through and solving LSAT questions. Lessons and strategies are carefully combined with pinpointed drills and hundreds of real LSAT problems to help you transform what you read about into what you can do. Other books can help you understand the LSAT. The LSAT Trainer will help you get better at it.
具体描述
读后感
评分
评分
评分
评分
用户评价
关于Logical Reasoning的讨论不如bible细致，关于reading comprehension的讨论不如manhattan可操作，总的来说适合有基础的人。作者的语言太夸张了，关注basic的练习说起来好听，操作起来不见得好，还是老老实实走bible-manhattan-大量pt的路线比较好
评分读了两章，弃了。主要是LR部分的题型分类怎么这么杂乱？把清楚的不同题型揉到一节，美其名曰apple≠orange，1＋1≠3…令人费解。也可能Manhattan里的分类先入为主了。
评分Logic部分赞。
评分关于Logical Reasoning的讨论不如bible细致，关于reading comprehension的讨论不如manhattan可操作，总的来说适合有基础的人。作者的语言太夸张了，关注basic的练习说起来好听，操作起来不见得好，还是老老实实走bible-manhattan-大量pt的路线比较好
评分关于Logical Reasoning的讨论不如bible细致，关于reading comprehension的讨论不如manhattan可操作，总的来说适合有基础的人。作者的语言太夸张了，关注basic的练习说起来好听，操作起来不见得好，还是老老实实走bible-manhattan-大量pt的路线比较好
相关图书
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息，本站不存储任何数据与内容，任何内容与数据均与本站无关，如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有