These four conceptual and critical essays on state and society in contemporary China argue vigorously against the grain of prevailing scholarly interpretation. In substantive content, they explore two major themes from different historical and theoretical points of departure.
First, the author argues that the party/state under Mao fell far short of the full control over China's peasant society that outside observers often assumed it had achieved. She shows, instead, how the Maoist state frequently pursued policies that in fact had the ironic effect of strengthening the resistance of rural communities against the central political apparatus. Second, she contends that once the true limitations on the Maoist state's power in rural areas are rightly understood, it becomes clear that one effect of the post-Mao economic and political reforms may be to enhance rather than to diminish the state's authority in the countryside — despite all the reformists' rhetoric to the contrary.
These essays on "how to think about the Chinese state" are designed to stimulate debate about assumptions and methods in the field of Chinese political analysis. The controversies they raise, however, make them highly relevant to scholars outside Chinese studies who are interested in theories of the state, in the interrelations of state and society, and in the fate of the peasantry under socialism.
Vivienne Shue is Professor and Chair of the Department of Government at Cornell University.
評分
評分
評分
評分
國傢的整閤、抽取、介入和地方自主性。從毛時代的蜂巢到鄧時代的網,鄧(聯盟)以“現代化”為口號,完成模式的轉換。在之前,1911年革命之後,因為一直很苦逼,軍閥、日寇還有叛亂,國傢是比較無力的。 總之,主要的立足點在於打臉“totalitarianism”,提齣一個研究中國的新的可能,更希望超越這個可能。
评分在本書的第三章對於國傢滲透的狀況進行瞭精彩的分析,也是全書最大的亮點。對於打破我們對於1949-1980時代中國的偏見大有裨益。其他部分感覺一般。
评分有的地方已成常識,有的地方值得商榷,有的地方過於理想化,但依舊值得一讀。英文寫得很漂亮,抄瞭不少(
评分so, in the post-reform era, only the appearance of localistic and complicit bureaucrats persists, the morality of local protectionism along with the honeycomb-like social structure in which it was embedded in are replaced by the calculation of self-interested technocrats and their structural buddy of the web-like market economy.
评分國傢與社會關係、“過程”取嚮。三種方法論。
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美書屋 版权所有