Designed for philosophers as well as readers with no particular philosophical background, the essays in this lively book are grouped into four amusing acts. Act One looks at the four Seinfeld characters through a philosophical lens and includes Jerry and Socrates: The Examined Life? Act Two examines historical philosophers from a Seinfeldian standpoint and offers Plato or Nietzsche? Time, Essence, and Eternal Recurrence in Seinfeld. Act Three, Untimely Meditations by the Water Cooler, explores philosophical issues raised by the show, such as, Is it rational for George to do the opposite? And Act Four, Is There Anything Wrong with That?, discusses ethical problems of everyday life using Seinfeld as a basis. Seinfeld and Philosophy also provides a guide to Seinfeld episodes and a chronological list of the philosophers cited in this book.
具體描述
讀後感
評分
評分
評分
評分
用戶評價
裏麵大部分聯係都比較牽強，但對我這種哲盲來說還有一定啓發。感覺最有意思的是那篇通過Kierkegaard aesthetic-ethical-religious人生三段論講Kramer的文章。用Elaine老闆Peterman講左派理論傢Slavoj Žižek 的ideology概念，和用最後一集中的Good Samaritan law講絕對利己論的那幾篇也還可以。
评分裏麵大部分聯係都比較牽強，但對我這種哲盲來說還有一定啓發。感覺最有意思的是那篇通過Kierkegaard aesthetic-ethical-religious人生三段論講Kramer的文章。用Elaine老闆Peterman講左派理論傢Slavoj Žižek 的ideology概念，和用最後一集中的Good Samaritan law講絕對利己論的那幾篇也還可以。
评分裏麵大部分聯係都比較牽強，但對我這種哲盲來說還有一定啓發。感覺最有意思的是那篇通過Kierkegaard aesthetic-ethical-religious人生三段論講Kramer的文章。用Elaine老闆Peterman講左派理論傢Slavoj Žižek 的ideology概念，和用最後一集中的Good Samaritan law講絕對利己論的那幾篇也還可以。
评分裏麵大部分聯係都比較牽強，但對我這種哲盲來說還有一定啓發。感覺最有意思的是那篇通過Kierkegaard aesthetic-ethical-religious人生三段論講Kramer的文章。用Elaine老闆Peterman講左派理論傢Slavoj Žižek 的ideology概念，和用最後一集中的Good Samaritan law講絕對利己論的那幾篇也還可以。
评分裏麵大部分聯係都比較牽強，但對我這種哲盲來說還有一定啓發。感覺最有意思的是那篇通過Kierkegaard aesthetic-ethical-religious人生三段論講Kramer的文章。用Elaine老闆Peterman講左派理論傢Slavoj Žižek 的ideology概念，和用最後一集中的Good Samaritan law講絕對利己論的那幾篇也還可以。
相關圖書
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息，本站不存儲任何數據與內容，任何內容與數據均與本站無關，如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美書屋 版权所有