Designed for philosophers as well as readers with no particular philosophical background, the essays in this lively book are grouped into four amusing acts. Act One looks at the four Seinfeld characters through a philosophical lens and includes Jerry and Socrates: The Examined Life? Act Two examines historical philosophers from a Seinfeldian standpoint and offers Plato or Nietzsche? Time, Essence, and Eternal Recurrence in Seinfeld. Act Three, Untimely Meditations by the Water Cooler, explores philosophical issues raised by the show, such as, Is it rational for George to do the opposite? And Act Four, Is There Anything Wrong with That?, discusses ethical problems of everyday life using Seinfeld as a basis. Seinfeld and Philosophy also provides a guide to Seinfeld episodes and a chronological list of the philosophers cited in this book.
具体描述
读后感
评分
评分
评分
评分
用户评价
里面大部分联系都比较牵强，但对我这种哲盲来说还有一定启发。感觉最有意思的是那篇通过Kierkegaard aesthetic-ethical-religious人生三段论讲Kramer的文章。用Elaine老板Peterman讲左派理论家Slavoj Žižek 的ideology概念，和用最后一集中的Good Samaritan law讲绝对利己论的那几篇也还可以。
评分里面大部分联系都比较牵强，但对我这种哲盲来说还有一定启发。感觉最有意思的是那篇通过Kierkegaard aesthetic-ethical-religious人生三段论讲Kramer的文章。用Elaine老板Peterman讲左派理论家Slavoj Žižek 的ideology概念，和用最后一集中的Good Samaritan law讲绝对利己论的那几篇也还可以。
评分里面大部分联系都比较牵强，但对我这种哲盲来说还有一定启发。感觉最有意思的是那篇通过Kierkegaard aesthetic-ethical-religious人生三段论讲Kramer的文章。用Elaine老板Peterman讲左派理论家Slavoj Žižek 的ideology概念，和用最后一集中的Good Samaritan law讲绝对利己论的那几篇也还可以。
评分里面大部分联系都比较牵强，但对我这种哲盲来说还有一定启发。感觉最有意思的是那篇通过Kierkegaard aesthetic-ethical-religious人生三段论讲Kramer的文章。用Elaine老板Peterman讲左派理论家Slavoj Žižek 的ideology概念，和用最后一集中的Good Samaritan law讲绝对利己论的那几篇也还可以。
评分里面大部分联系都比较牵强，但对我这种哲盲来说还有一定启发。感觉最有意思的是那篇通过Kierkegaard aesthetic-ethical-religious人生三段论讲Kramer的文章。用Elaine老板Peterman讲左派理论家Slavoj Žižek 的ideology概念，和用最后一集中的Good Samaritan law讲绝对利己论的那几篇也还可以。
相关图书
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息，本站不存储任何数据与内容，任何内容与数据均与本站无关，如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有