Liberals have acclaimed, and conservatives decried, reliance on courts as tools for changes. But while debate rages over whether the courts should be playing such a legislative role, Gerald N. Rosenberg poses a far more fundamental question—can courts produce political and social reform?
Rosenberg presents, with remarkable skill, an overwhelming case that efforts to use the courts to generate significant reforms in civil rights, abortion, and women's rights were largely failures.
"The real strength of The Hollow Hope . . . is its resuscitation of American Politics—the old-fashioned representative kind—as a valid instrument of social change. Indeed, the flip side of Mr. Rosenberg's argument that courts don't do all that much is the refreshing view that politics in the best sense of the word—as deliberation and choice over economic and social changes, as well as over moral issues—is still the core of what makes America the great nation it is. . . . A book worth reading."—Gary L. McDowell, The Washington Times
具體描述
讀後感
評分
評分
評分
評分
用戶評價
法院的角色
评分Bold argument，great data, but considerable overstatement regarding the inherent ineffectiveness of legal tactics and the significance of insights regarding judicial effects provided by his top-down framework. Meanwhile, McCann's (1993) rival analytical approaches have been subtly skirted by Rosenberg. Rember: the unique role of the court here.
评分匠氣之作。法院無法引領社會改革，指齣瞭三大約束和發揮作用的四個條件，並用詳盡的經驗研究來驗證。確確實實看做是最小危險部門瞭。
评分Bold argument，great data, but considerable overstatement regarding the inherent ineffectiveness of legal tactics and the significance of insights regarding judicial effects provided by his top-down framework. Meanwhile, McCann's (1993) rival analytical approaches have been subtly skirted by Rosenberg. Rember: the unique role of the court here.
评分定量思維組織質性材料
相關圖書
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息，本站不存儲任何數據與內容，任何內容與數據均與本站無關，如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美書屋 版权所有