The Hollow Hope pdf epub mobi txt 电子书下载 2024

☆☆☆☆☆
简体网页||繁体网页

Gerald N. Rosenberg

University Of Chicago Press

1993-5-15

432

USD 19.00

Paperback

9780226727035

图书标签: 美国宪政法律社会学最高法院美国法律法学违宪审查政治学

喜欢 The Hollow Hope 的读者还喜欢

下载链接在页面底部

点击这里下载

facebook linkedin mastodon messenger pinterest reddit telegram twitter viber vkontakte whatsapp 复制链接

想要找书就要到小哈图书下载中心

qciss.net

立刻按 ctrl+D收藏本页

你会得到大惊喜!!

发表于2024-11-22

The Hollow Hope epub 下载 mobi 下载 pdf 下载 txt 电子书下载 2024

The Hollow Hope pdf epub mobi txt 电子书下载 2024

图书描述

Liberals have acclaimed, and conservatives decried, reliance on courts as tools for changes. But while debate rages over whether the courts should be playing such a legislative role, Gerald N. Rosenberg poses a far more fundamental question—can courts produce political and social reform?

Rosenberg presents, with remarkable skill, an overwhelming case that efforts to use the courts to generate significant reforms in civil rights, abortion, and women's rights were largely failures.

"The real strength of The Hollow Hope . . . is its resuscitation of American Politics—the old-fashioned representative kind—as a valid instrument of social change. Indeed, the flip side of Mr. Rosenberg's argument that courts don't do all that much is the refreshing view that politics in the best sense of the word—as deliberation and choice over economic and social changes, as well as over moral issues—is still the core of what makes America the great nation it is. . . . A book worth reading."—Gary L. McDowell, The Washington Times

The Hollow Hope 下载 mobi epub pdf txt 电子书

著者简介

图书目录

The Hollow Hope pdf epub mobi txt 电子书下载

想要找书就要到小哈图书下载中心

qciss.net

立刻按 ctrl+D收藏本页

你会得到大惊喜!!

用户评价

评分☆☆☆☆☆

匠气之作。法院无法引领社会改革，指出了三大约束和发挥作用的四个条件，并用详尽的经验研究来验证。确确实实看做是最小危险部门了。

评分☆☆☆☆☆

扫过

评分☆☆☆☆☆

simply and clearly written why the Court in the U.S. is restricted in bringing forth significant social changes.

评分☆☆☆☆☆

Bold argument，great data, but considerable overstatement regarding the inherent ineffectiveness of legal tactics and the significance of insights regarding judicial effects provided by his top-down framework. Meanwhile, McCann's (1993) rival analytical approaches have been subtly skirted by Rosenberg. Rember: the unique role of the court here.

评分☆☆☆☆☆

扫过