Liberals have acclaimed, and conservatives decried, reliance on courts as tools for changes. But while debate rages over whether the courts should be playing such a legislative role, Gerald N. Rosenberg poses a far more fundamental question—can courts produce political and social reform?
Rosenberg presents, with remarkable skill, an overwhelming case that efforts to use the courts to generate significant reforms in civil rights, abortion, and women's rights were largely failures.
"The real strength of The Hollow Hope . . . is its resuscitation of American Politics—the old-fashioned representative kind—as a valid instrument of social change. Indeed, the flip side of Mr. Rosenberg's argument that courts don't do all that much is the refreshing view that politics in the best sense of the word—as deliberation and choice over economic and social changes, as well as over moral issues—is still the core of what makes America the great nation it is. . . . A book worth reading."—Gary L. McDowell, The Washington Times
具体描述
读后感
评分
评分
评分
评分
用户评价
Bold argument，great data, but considerable overstatement regarding the inherent ineffectiveness of legal tactics and the significance of insights regarding judicial effects provided by his top-down framework. Meanwhile, McCann's (1993) rival analytical approaches have been subtly skirted by Rosenberg. Rember: the unique role of the court here.
评分定量思维组织质性材料
评分法院的角色
评分simply and clearly written why the Court in the U.S. is restricted in bringing forth significant social changes.
评分司法政治学的阅读材料，其实学的更多的是他的研究方法。
相关图书
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息，本站不存储任何数据与内容，任何内容与数据均与本站无关，如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有