During the course of the twentieth century, analytic philosophy developed into the dominant philosophical tradition in the English-speaking world. In the last two decades, it has become increasingly influential in the rest of the world, from continental Europe to Latin America and Asia. At the same time there has been deepening interest in the origins and history of analytic philosophy, as analytic philosophers examine the foundations of their tradition and question many of the assumptions of their predecessors. This has led to greater historical self-consciousness among analytic philosophers and more scholarly work on the historical contexts in which analytic philosophy developed. This historical turn in analytic philosophy has been gathering pace since the 1990s, and the present volume is the most comprehensive collection of essays to date on the history of analytic philosophy. It contains state-of-the-art contributions from many of the leading scholars in the field, all of the contributions specially commissioned. The introductory essays discuss the nature and historiography of analytic philosophy, accompanied by a detailed chronology and bibliography. Part One elucidates the origins of analytic philosophy, with special emphasis on the work of Frege, Russell, Moore, and Wittgenstein. Part Two explains the development of analytic philosophy, from Oxford realism and logical positivism to the most recent work in analytic philosophy, and includes essays on ethics, aesthetics, and political philosophy as well as on the areas usually seen as central to analytic philosophy, such as philosophy of language and mind. Part Three explores certain key themes in the history of analytic philosophy.
Edited by Michael Beaney, University of York
Michael Beaney is Professor of Philosophy at the University of York. He works on the history of analytic philosophy and on conceptions of analysis in the history of philosophy. He is the author of Frege: Making Sense (Duckworth, 1996), and editor of The Frege Reader (Blackwell, 1997), Gottlob Frege: Critical Assessments of Leading Philosophers (with Erich Reck; 4 vols., Routledge, 2005), and The Analytic Turn (Routledge, 2007). He is Editor of the British Journal for the History of Philosophy.
Contributors:
Maria Baghramian, University College Dublin
Thomas Baldwin, University of York
Michael Beaney, University of York
Tyler Burge, University of California, Los Angeles
Stewart Candlish, University of Western Australia
Annalisa Coliva, University of Modena
Sean Crawford, University of Manchester
Nic Damnjanovic, University of Western Australia
Jonathan Dancy, University of Reading/University of Texas at Austin
Cora Diamond, University of Virginia
Julia Driver, Washington University in St. Louis
Juliet Floyd, Boston University
Gottfried Gabriel, University of Jena
Richard Gaskin, University of Liverpool
Hanjo Glock, University of Zurich
Nicholas Griffin, McMaster University
Peter Hacker, Oxford University
Gary Hatfield, University of Pennsylvania
Richard Heck, Brown University
David Hyder, University of Ottawa
Peter Hylton, University of Illinois at Chicago
Andrew Jorgensen, University College Dublin
Mark Kalderon, University College London
Michael Kremer, University of Chicago
Peter Lamarque, University of York
Bernard Linsky, University of Alberta
Robert May, University of California, Davis
Alex Miller, University of Otago
Cheryl Misak, University of Toronto
Jaroslav Peregrin, Charles University, Prague
Erich Reck, University of California, Riverside
Sanford Shieh, Wesleyan University
Peter Simons, Trinity College Dublin
John Skorupski, University of St Andrews
David Woodruff Smith, University of California, Irvine
Jamie Tappenden, University of Michigan
Mark Textor, King's College London
Charles Travis, King's College London
Thomas Uebel, University of Manchester
J. Wolff, University College London
评分
评分
评分
评分
初拿到这本书,就被它沉甸甸的分量所震撼,这本身就预示着其内容的丰富与扎实。我之前对分析哲学的了解,多停留在一些碎片化的概念和零星的人物介绍上,总觉得缺少一个清晰的历史线索和宏观的视角。我希望这本手册能够像一本详尽的地图册,为我勾勒出分析哲学发展的全貌。我设想着,它会从那些奠基性的著作和思想家开始,比如弗雷格、罗素、维特根斯坦,然后循序渐进地展现出逻辑实证主义的兴盛与衰落,以及语言哲学的崛起,如奥斯汀、赖尔等人的贡献。我期待的不仅仅是事件的罗列,更是对这些思想是如何在特定的历史文化背景下产生、演变,以及它们之间如何相互影响、激荡出新的火花的深入剖析。此外,我希望它能为我解读那些晦涩的哲学文本提供必要的历史语境,让我能够更深刻地理解那些抽象概念背后的深意。这本书,对我而言,更像是一次穿越时空的哲学之旅,去探寻那些塑造了现代思想版图的伟大灵魂。
评分我购买这本书的初衷,是希望能对分析哲学的发展史有一个更为系统和深入的了解。在接触哲学过程中,我常常会在阅读某个哲学家的著作时,被其提到的前人思想所吸引,但往往很难找到一条清晰的脉络来追溯这些思想的源头和演变。我希望这本《牛津哲学史手册》能够填补我在这方面的知识空白,它应该像一位博学的向导,带领我逐一拜访分析哲学史上的重要人物,并解读他们各自的思想贡献。我猜想,它会详细介绍从早期以逻辑和语言分析为核心的思潮,到后来对日常语言的关注,再到当代一些更加细分和专业化的研究方向。我特别希望能看到它对那些哲学上的重大转折点和学术争论的精彩阐述,比如逻辑实证主义的经验主义原则是如何受到挑战的,以及后来的“语言转向”对哲学研究方式带来了怎样的改变。总而言之,我期待它能帮助我建立起一个对分析哲学史的立体认知,理解其内在的逻辑联系和发展规律。
评分我一直对分析哲学在20世纪思想史上的地位和影响感到好奇,但苦于没有一个系统性的入门材料。这本书的标题《The Oxford Handbook of The History of Analytic Philosophy》正好击中了我内心的需求。我设想它不仅仅是一部关于哲学家的传记集合,更是一次对分析哲学作为一个整体思想运动的深度考察。我期待它能带领我深入了解分析哲学是如何在与科学、数学的紧密联系中,逐渐形成其独特的分析方法和哲学视野。我希望它能细致地梳理出从早期对逻辑和语言的聚焦,到后来对心灵、知识、伦理等各个领域的哲学探索。我特别希望能看到书中对那些关键转折点的详细论述,比如维特根斯坦的哲学思想如何从早期到后期的转变,以及日常语言哲学对传统形而上学提出的挑战。总而言之,我希望这本书能为我提供一个扎实而又生动的分析哲学史的叙事,让我能够更好地理解那些塑造了现代哲学格局的重要思想和人物。
评分坦白说,我选择这本书,很大程度上是被它的权威性所吸引。“牛津手册”系列一贯以其严谨的学术态度和高水平的编纂而闻名,所以我对它寄予了很高的期望。我并非哲学专业的科班出身,但对哲学,尤其是分析哲学,一直抱有浓厚的兴趣。在阅读一些哲学入门读物时,我发现自己常常会遇到一些难以理解的术语和复杂的论证,并且常常觉得它们之间缺乏一个整体的联系。我希望这本《牛津手册》能够为我提供一个清晰的历史框架,帮助我理解分析哲学是如何从萌芽发展到如今的多元状态。我设想它会涵盖从逻辑实证主义的早期探索,到语言哲学的深入研究,再到后来分析哲学在各个分支领域的发展。我特别希望它能够解释清楚一些核心的哲学概念是如何被一代代哲学家所继承、发展或者批判的,以及这些思想背后所蕴含的时代背景和社会影响。这本书,在我看来,应该是一次对分析哲学“根源”的追溯,一次对“演进”的梳理。
评分这本书的封面设计就很有吸引力,深邃的蓝色背景搭配烫金的英文字体,散发着一种沉静而又充满智慧的学术气息。我是在一个偶然的机会在书店里瞥见的,当时就被它厚重的体积和“牛津手册”的 title 所吸引,立刻就产生了想要一探究竟的冲动。我一直对哲学,尤其是分析哲学的发展脉络和核心思想有着浓厚的兴趣,而“The Oxford Handbook”这个系列的书通常都是学术界的重量级作品,所以我想象着这本书一定能为我打开一扇通往分析哲学史深处的大门。我预想它会是一部集大成之作,能够系统地梳理从早期逻辑实证主义到后来的日常语言学派,再到当代语境下的各种思潮演变,并能对其中的重要人物、关键概念和学术争鸣进行详尽的阐释。我尤其期待它能触及一些我可能不太熟悉但却至关重要的发展阶段,比如分析哲学在不同国家和地区的传播与本土化进程,以及它与其他哲学流派之间的互动和影响。总而言之,我抱着极大的期望,希望这本书能满足我对分析哲学史的深度求知欲。
评分细读中
评分细读中
评分拼死拼活在chronology上加了个洪谦,却不见王浩名字。
评分细读中
评分细读中
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有