Erwin Panofsky's Perspective as Symbolic Form is one of the great works of modern intellectual history, the legendary text that has dominated all art historical and philosophical discussions on the topic of perspective in this century. Finally available in English, it is an unrivaled example of Panofsky's early method that placed him within broader developments in theories of knowledge and cultural change. Here, drawing on a massive body of learning that ranges over Antique philosophy, theology, science, and optics as well as the history of art, Panofsky produces a type of "archaeology" of Western representation that far surpasses the usual scope of art historical studies.<br /> <br /> Perspective in Panofsky's hands becomes a central component of a Western "will to form," the expression of a schema linking the social, cognitive, psychological, and especially technical practices of a given culture into harmonious and integrated wholes. Yet the perceptual schema of each historical culture or epoch is different, and each gives rise to a different but equally full vision of the world. Panofsky articulates these different spatial systems, demonstrating their particular coherence and compatibility with the modes of knowledge, belief, and exchange that characterized the cultures in which they arose. Our own modernity, Panofsky shows, is characterized by its peculiarly mathematical expression of the concept of the infinite, within a space that is necessarily both continuous and homogeneous.
Christopher S. Wood is Professor in the Department of History of Art, Yale University. He is the author of Albrecht Altdorfer and the Origins of Landscape, and the editor of The Vienna School Reader: Politics and Art Historical Method in the 1930s (Zone Books, 2000).
評分
評分
評分
評分
注解比正文還厚,感覺很用心。然而我藝術史基礎太差瞭。
评分對透視概念的梳理和曆史演進過程采用的是維柯式的positivistic view,在個人閱讀經驗中此書方法亦正與Auerbach論文藝復興時的perspectiva異麯同工(the "truth revealed through certainty, or philosophy revealed through philology" kind of structuralism——將某種形式元素“抽離”而使之成為某種觀念-心智史主題演進的隱喻)。最為精彩的無疑是對透視的“Bharunda”屬性的透闢分析;在對古典-文藝復興之間的中世紀的論述,從“勢不得不如此”以降,“過渡性”的建構-編織過程便清晰可見,也許是全書製作-詩藝痕跡最重的部分。
评分翻譯如深潭。
评分短小精悍
评分正文很短,言簡意賅,論文寫作之範本。正在讀第二遍
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美書屋 版权所有