No text has its meaning alone; all texts have their meaning in relation to other texts. Since Julia Kristeva coined the term in the 1960s, intertextuality has been a dominant idea within literary and cultural studies leaving none of the traditional ideas about reading or writing undisturbed. This book, the first full-length study of intertextuality in English, fills an important gap. Following all the major turns in the term's history, this handy guide clearly explains how intertextuality is employed in structuralist, post-structuralist, semiotic, deconstructive, reader-response, marxist, feminist and psychoanalytic theory. From the alternative origins of Saussurean linguistics and the work of Bakhtin the book traces the major directions of intertextual theory to the postmodern present.
評分
評分
評分
評分
把復雜的概念條分縷析,且有一定原創性,比那些堆砌史料、毫無係統的維基百科式學術專著不知高到哪裏去瞭。The best way to internalize a critical concept is to place it within the entire system in which it was initially invented.
评分很好的雞精
评分很好的雞精
评分把復雜的概念條分縷析,且有一定原創性,比那些堆砌史料、毫無係統的維基百科式學術專著不知高到哪裏去瞭。The best way to internalize a critical concept is to place it within the entire system in which it was initially invented.
评分從導師微信上拿到並且被告知研一上專業課的時候早就給過我的那一瞬間,簡直感受到瞭仙劍裏麵穿越到童年迴憶拿到水靈珠纔能通關的場景……
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美書屋 版权所有