H.L.A. (Herbert) Hart (1907-1992)
was the son of a Jewish tailor of Polish and German descent. He was educated at Bradford Grammar School and New College Oxford, where he obtained a brilliant first class in Classical Greats. He practised at the Chancery Bar from 1932 to 1940 along with Richard (later Lord) Wilberforce. During the war, being unfit for active service, he worked in MI5. During this time his interests returned to philosophy and in 1945 he was appointed philosophy tutor at New College. He was strongly influenced by the linguistic philosophy then current in Oxford, but employed its techniques more constructively than did most members of the movement. In 1952, given his chancery background, he was persuaded by J.L. Austin to be a candidate for the Oxford chair of Jurisprudence when Professor Arthur Goodhart resigned. He was elected and held the chair until 1969.
From 1952 on he delivered the undergraduate lectures that turned into The Concept of Law (1961, posthumous second edition 1994). He also lectured on right and duties, but these lectures were never published. He held seminars with Tony Honoré on causation, leading to their joint work Causation in the Law (1959, second edition 1985). His visit to Harvard in 1956-7 led to his Holmes lecture on 'Positivism and the Separation of Law and Morals' (1958) and a famous controversy with Lon Fuller. Returning to the UK he engaged in an equally famous debate with Patrick (later Lord) Devlin on the limits within which the criminal law should try to enforce morality. Hart published two books on the subject, Law, Liberty and Morality (1963) and The Morality of the Criminal Law (1965). A wider interest in criminal law, stimulated by Rupert (later Professor Sir Rupert) Cross was signalled by his 'Prolegomenon to the Principles of Punishment' (1959). Nine of his essays on the criminal law were collected in Punishment and Responsibility (1968). In 1968 he was asked by Oxford University to chair a commission on relations with junior members, then at a low ebb, and produced a notably perceptive and constructive report.
Feeling that his powers were waning Hart resigned his chair in 1969, to be succeeded by Ronald Dworkin, a severe critic of his legal philosophy. He now devoted himself mainly to the study of Bentham, whom, along with Kelsen, he regarded as the most important legal philosopher of modern times. Ten of his essays were collected in Essays on Bentham (1982). From 1973 to 1978 he was Principal of Brasenose College. In his last years he was much concerned to find a convincing reply to Dworkin's criticisms of his version of legal positivism. A sketch of Hart's reply is to be found in the postscript to the second edition of The Concept of Law.
Hart's main aim as a lecturer and writer was to tell the truth and be clear. He was the most widely read British legal philosopher of the twentieth century and his work will continue to be a focus of discussion.
H L A Hart's The Concept of Law is the classic text for the study of jurisprudence and legal philosophy and is probably the most important work of legal philosophy written this century. This second edition is particularly valuable as it combines Hart's original text with a postscript, in which he responds to criticisms of his theory levelled by such notable scholars as Dworkin, Fuller and Finnis. Written by him but only discovered after his death, it has been ably edited by Joseph Raz and Penelope Bulloch of Balliol College, Oxford.
「法理思维与名著导读(四):哈特《法律的概念》导读」 陈景辉 中国政法大学法理学研究所副教授 本文以下引用的页码皆以英文版 H.L.AHart,TheConceptofLaw,Oxford:ClarendonPress,2nd.ed.(1994). 中译本请见,许家馨、李冠宜译,法律的概念,2000年。本文以下所引用的页码以英...
评分 评分【motive在哈特三步走里的地位】fear/morality/self-interest等各种动机→→determination to obey守法的内在面向→→behavior of obedience守法的外在面向。奥斯特OBBT模型错误地将动机限缩为仅fear一种。 承认规则是法体系基础 The case for calling the rule of recognition...
评分分析法学是现代性的产物,它一面摆脱神学,一面攻城略地,建立起逻辑自洽的体系,拼命朝科学靠拢。它谢绝了一切超验的外在权威,把立足点放在了社会事实本身。现代世界诸神隐退,冲突在不同价值预设的群体中产生。当社会中的人们以自己的利益诉求为对象进入社会,排除分...
评分分析法学是现代性的产物,它一面摆脱神学,一面攻城略地,建立起逻辑自洽的体系,拼命朝科学靠拢。它谢绝了一切超验的外在权威,把立足点放在了社会事实本身。现代世界诸神隐退,冲突在不同价值预设的群体中产生。当社会中的人们以自己的利益诉求为对象进入社会,排除分...
Law is not rules backed by force, not external regular obedience, not morality. Advanced society has a complete legal system consisting of primary and secondary rules. [But why are secondary rules obeyed? It's a question of infinity!]破而不立。作者说是写给英国法学本科生看的。真的吗?我很怀疑。因为他似乎是在向整个法律界当时的“通说”发起挑战。自然法的部分深入浅出,相当精彩。国际法也有意思,从来没想过的角度。看完Dworkin再回头来看32年后的postcript
评分这一刻期待已久......????
评分常读常新,还是原版好
评分法哲学的启蒙之作,原典精读的第一本。
评分去年写论文耽误了朱老师的课,这学期跟着读原著读了五六次了,虽然动机不纯,专为挑哈特的刺,但也被逻辑的力量征服,朱老师也是那种朴实无华型的学者,交流起来不嫌我水平差。 另外,哈特不可能没读过韦伯。
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有