With the incisiveness and lucid style for which he is renowned, Ronald Dworkin has written a masterful explanation of how the Anglo-American legal system works and on what principles it is grounded. Law's Empire is a full-length presentation of his theory of law that will be studied and debated--by scholars and theorists, by lawyers and judges, by students and political activists--for years to come. </p>
Dworkin begins with the question that is at the heart of the whole legal system: in difficult cases how do (and how should) judges decide what the law is? He shows that judges must decide hard cases by interpreting rather than simply applying past legal decisions, and he produces a general theory of what interpretation is--in literature as well as in law--and of when one interpretation is better than others. Every legal interpretation reflects an underlying theory about the general character of law: Dworkin assesses three such theories. One, which has been very influential, takes the law of a community to be only what the established conventions of that community say it is. Another, currently in vogue, assumes that legal practice is best understood as an instrument of society to achieve its goals. Dworkin argues forcefully and persuasively against both these views: he insists that the most fundamental point of law is not to report consensus or provide efficient means to social goals, but to answer the requirement that a political community act in a coherent and principled manner toward all its members. He discusses, in the light of that view, cases at common law, cases arising under statutes, and great constitutional cases in the Supreme Court, and he systematically demonstrates that his concept of political and legal integrity is the key to Anglo-American legal theory and practice. </p>
Introduction American jurisprudence is marked by a concentration with the judicial process, that is how judges reason and should reason in deciding particular cases. In Professor Hart’s metaphorical words, American jurisprudence has oscillated between tw...
评分Ronald Dworkin’s Published Papers 凡例: 1. Ronald Dworkin已出版著作与公开发表论文多有重叠,但又有所不同。遍及网络编者尚未发现相对全面的梳理。考虑到便利研究者查找相关文献,编者制作本列表。 2. 本列表收录Ronald Dworkin公开发表于期刊上的论文、评论、书评,以及...
评分1.这本书的中文版是个噩梦,只要不是英文文盲,请尽量读原版。 2.论证搭建的极其细密,要非常小心才能不被层叠的隐喻和修辞绕晕。 3.复杂的言辞背后,这本书最大的野心,应该是在实证主义的铜墙铁壁中,为政治对法律的入侵打开一个通道。 4.其方法主要是精确的分类学和精巧的解...
评分 评分[按语:“法律帝国(Law’s empire)”一词仿佛隐喻法律的人格化,在前言首段中有出现。此书中Dworkin批评了法律实证主义(用批评时髦的法律语义学的形式),辩护了law as integrity的道德主义法学理想(偏向于自然法学派,但并不主张一种独立于共同体之外的a priori morality...
以台译为主,读不懂就对照英文原版,往往豁然开朗(当然也有很多仍然不明白的地方)。无耻地标注个读完。
评分以台译为主,读不懂就对照英文原版,往往豁然开朗(当然也有很多仍然不明白的地方)。无耻地标注个读完。
评分时间不够 要还回去.. 法哲学部分好理解... 法学部分不好理解...... 没法学基础啊...
评分very interesting and classic
评分1,2,3,6,9
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有