The City and Man pdf epub mobi txt 电子书下载 2025

☆☆☆☆☆

Leo Strauss (1899--1973) was born and educated in Germany, receiving his doctorate from Hamburg University in 1921. He came to the United States in 1938 and taught political science and philosophy at the New School for Social Research for a decade. He joined the faculty of the University of Chicago as professor of political philosophy in 1949 and was eventually named Robert Maynard Hutchins Distinguished Service Professor. Among his many books are The Political Philosophy of Hobbes; Natural Right and History; and Thoughts on Machiavelli, all of which are available from the University of Chicago Press.

出版者:University Of Chicago Press

作者:Leo Strauss

出品人:

页数:254

译者:

出版时间:1978-11-15

价格:USD 19.00

装帧:Paperback

isbn号码:9780226777016

丛书系列:

图书标签:

政治哲学
施特劳斯
列奥·施特劳斯
柏拉图
哲学
古希腊
Strauss
亚里士多德

下载链接在页面底部

facebook linkedin mastodon messenger pinterest reddit telegram twitter viber vkontakte whatsapp 复制链接

想要找书就要到小美书屋

book.quotespace.org

立刻按 ctrl+D收藏本页

你会得到大惊喜!!

"The City and Man" consists of provocative essays by the late Leo Strauss on Aristotle's "Politics, " Plato's "Republic," and Thucydides' "Peloponnesian Wars." Together, the essays constitute a brilliant attempt to use classical political philosophy as a means of liberating modern political philosophy from the strangehold of ideology. The essays are based on a long and intimate familiarity with the works, but the essay on Aristotle is especially important as one of Strauss's few writings on the philosopher who largely shaped Strauss's conception of antiquity. The essay on Plato is a full-scale discussion of Platonic political philosophy, wide in scope yet compact in execution. When discussing Thucydides, Strauss scceeds not only in presenting the historian as a moral thinker of high rank, but in drawing his thought into the orbit of philosophy, and thus indicating a relation of history and philosophy that does not presuppose the absorption of philosphy by history.

具体描述

读后感

评分☆☆☆☆☆

本文仅作第十一章On Plato's Republic分析 1、讨论“反讽”。施格劳斯提到苏格拉底是一个反讽专家，并因反讽而臭名昭著，他说，反讽是一种伪装，是一种虚假，亚里斯多德也说反讽是个坏毛病。事实上苏格拉底的反讽是一种掩饰，但它不是对坏的行为或罪恶的伪装，而是对...

评分☆☆☆☆☆

贺晴川译既不是遗忘自我和爱好痛苦的好古癖，也不是遗忘自我和令人陶醉的浪漫主义，诱使我们怀着热烈的兴趣和无条件的意愿转向古典政治思想的研习。我们不得不这样做，是因为我们时代的危机，西方的危机。对每个人而言，遵守和聆听来自公义与信仰之城的神圣消息还远远不够。...

评分☆☆☆☆☆

用户评价

评分☆☆☆☆☆

比自然权利与历史更直白

评分☆☆☆☆☆

雅典不在梭伦、伯里克利们的政治成就中而在修昔底德、柏拉图、亚里士多德们对雅典的理解中达到自己的巅峰。城邦因处于现实的囹圄而无法超越人的自然，但政治哲学家和政治史家需要在对人之自然的理解中去思考城邦的自然。

评分☆☆☆☆☆

第三篇大一时读过，不过基本忘了。重新读了第一篇第二篇。第一篇三星，第二篇非常精彩，加总起来还是给五星，毕竟亚里士多德部分看上去就是个幌子，施特劳斯好像也没打算认真讨论。搁置施特劳斯政治立场，柏拉图的读法还是非常有启发性。澄清论证是基本工作，所有工作的基础，不过苏格拉底的论证实在是漏洞百出。要么就将柏拉图对话当成没什么价值的哲学笑话集，要么只能读成戏剧，至少我认为后者还是更有启发性。

评分☆☆☆☆☆

理想国那篇真的很精彩。但不太喜欢他对亚里士多德的解释。

评分☆☆☆☆☆

算是读完了，我觉得我还要重读一遍~