Dan Ariely is the James B. Duke Professor of Behavioral Economics at Duke University. He also holds an appointment at the MIT Media Lab where he is the head of the eRationality research group. He was formerly the Alfred P. Sloan Professor of Behavioral Economics at MIT Sloan School of Management.
Dan Ariely grew up in Israel after birth in New York. He served in the Israeli army and when 18 suffered third-degree burns over 70 percent of his body from an accidental magnesium flare explosion during training.
Ariely recovered and went on to graduate from Tel Aviv University and received a Ph.D. and M.A. in cognitive psychology from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, and a Ph.D. in business from Duke University. His research focuses on discovering and measuring how people make decisions. He models the human decision making process and in particular the irrational decisions that we all make every day.
Ariely is the author of the book, Predictably Irrational: The Hidden Forces That Shape Our Decisions, which was published on February 19, 2008 by HarperCollins. When asked whether reading Predictably Irrational and understanding one's irrational behaviors could make a person's life worse (such as by defeating the benefits of a placebo), Ariely responded that there could be a short term cost, but that there would also likely be longterm benefits, and that reading his book would not make a person worse off.
The New York Times bestselling author of Predictably Irrational and The Upside of Irrationality returns with thought-provoking work to challenge our preconceptions about dishonesty and urge us to take an honest look at ourselves.
Does the chance of getting caught affect how likely we are to cheat?
How do companies pave the way for dishonesty?
Does collaboration make us more honest or less so?
Does religion improve our honesty?
Most of us think of ourselves as honest, but, in fact, we all cheat. From Washington to Wall Street, the classroom to the workplace, unethical behavior is everywhere. None of us is immune, whether it's the white lie to head off trouble or padding our expense reports. In The (Honest) Truth About Dishonesty, award-winning, bestselling author Dan Ariely turns his unique insight and innovative research to the question of dishonesty.
Generally, we assume that cheating, like most other decisions, is based on a rational cost-benefit analysis. But Ariely argues, and then demonstrates, that it's actually the irrational forces that we don't take into account that often determine whether we behave ethically or not. For every Enron or political bribe, there are countless puffed rÉsumÉs, hidden commissions, and knockoff purses. In The (Honest) Truth About Dishonesty, Ariely shows why some things are easier to lie about; how getting caught matters less than we think; and how business practices pave the way for unethical behavior, both intentionally and unintentionally. Ariely explores how unethical behavior works in the personal, professional, and political worlds, and how it affects all of us, even as we think of ourselves as having high moral standards.
But all is not lost. Ariely also identifies what keeps us honest, pointing the way for achieving higher ethics in our everyday lives. With compelling personal and academic findings, The (Honest) Truth About Dishonesty will change the way we see ourselves, our actions, and others.
读《不诚实的诚实真相》,我仿佛回到了实验心理学大学课堂。丹·艾瑞里是杜克大学的经济学教授,研究人类的非理性行为,喜欢写作经济学普及文章,畅销书《怪诞行为学》就出自他手。这本书的开头,艾瑞里就将读者带到了他的课堂上,一个演员扮演百万富翁,向学生们兜售致富捷径...
評分 評分关于不诚实的真相 评《不诚实的诚实真相》 这本书的书名有足够的迷惑性:不诚实的诚实真相,那么这个真相到底诚实还是不诚实?细细读来,才知道是分析关于不诚实行为的背后动机、心理成因等等。因此,书名改为《关于不诚实的诚实真相》可能会更好。作者艾瑞里之前还写了《怪诞...
評分 評分传统观念认为,欺骗跟我们所做的其他决策一样,都是基于理性的成本收益分析的。但作者用真人行为实验证明,非理性才是决定我们诚实或不诚实的根本力量,并深入剖析了在个人身上、职场中和政治世界里,不诚实行为是如何发生和产生影响的,即使我们一直自诩自己的道德水准很高。 ...
與之前兩本相比,新鮮的東西真的不多。不過半年三本讀下來加上網上的追蹤,也算對作者和這個領域多少有些認知。更懂得自己和彆人多一些,更坦然的麵對生活,應該能讓自己活的更輕鬆快樂。想想“瞭不起的蓋茨比”中的一句話,“『不誠實』在女人身上永遠也不是一個嚴肅的問題。”
评分看著看著覺得人性真是個軟弱的東西。稍微不注意,我們就可以做齣不誠實的事情,而自己還完全渾然不知,但是不知的情況可能是自己把自己騙瞭,尤其是如果帶有“利人”的目的我們就更加支持自己的“善舉”。DA的書一如既往地好讀,聯閤各大學的學者一起進行有趣的小實驗。現在有瞭腦掃描,對認知研究真是大有幫助,雖然俺們連機器都沒摸過,但是看著人傢的試驗結果總是蠢蠢欲動。最後DA說實驗狀態下,米國人和中國人的欺騙行為是一樣的,不多不少,不過我還是覺得,中國人更傾嚮於欺騙,至少我目前我有限的人生和有限的交際中是這個印象。我想,最終的問題還在於社會和文化的影響吧。
评分超有趣~格式上,簡直就是一篇學術論文的白話版,學者怎麼做實驗,怎麼控製變量,設置對照組,得齣什麼結論,什麼limitations,一篇學術論文應該有的這本書都涵蓋瞭。內容上,用一次次行為實驗探討瞭人為什麼cheat,什麼情況下cheat得少一些,還有由此衍生的其他話題。
评分超有趣~格式上,簡直就是一篇學術論文的白話版,學者怎麼做實驗,怎麼控製變量,設置對照組,得齣什麼結論,什麼limitations,一篇學術論文應該有的這本書都涵蓋瞭。內容上,用一次次行為實驗探討瞭人為什麼cheat,什麼情況下cheat得少一些,還有由此衍生的其他話題。
评分Audiobook&Interviews
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美書屋 版权所有