A good book may have the power to change the way we see the world, but a great book actually becomes part of our daily consciousness, pervading our thinking to the point that we take it for granted, and we forget how provocative and challenging its ideas once were—and still are. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions is that kind of book. When it was first published in 1962, it was a landmark event in the history and philosophy of science. Fifty years later, it still has many lessons to teach.
With The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Kuhn challenged long-standing linear notions of scientific progress, arguing that transformative ideas don’t arise from the day-to-day, gradual process of experimentation and data accumulation but that the revolutions in science, those breakthrough moments that disrupt accepted thinking and offer unanticipated ideas, occur outside of “normal science,” as he called it. Though Kuhn was writing when physics ruled the sciences, his ideas on how scientific revolutions bring order to the anomalies that amass over time in research experiments are still instructive in our biotech age.
This new edition of Kuhn’s essential work in the history of science includes an insightful introduction by Ian Hacking, which clarifies terms popularized by Kuhn, including paradigm and incommensurability, and applies Kuhn’s ideas to the science of today. Usefully keyed to the separate sections of the book, Hacking’s introduction provides important background information as well as a contemporary context. Newly designed, with an expanded index, this edition will be eagerly welcomed by the next generation of readers seeking to understand the history of our perspectives on science.
American historian and philosopher of science, a leading contributor to the change of focus in the philosophy and sociology of science in the 1960s. Thomas Samuel Kuhn was born in Cincinnati, Ohio. He received a doctorate in theoretical physics from Harvard University in 1949. But he later shifted his interest to the history and philosophy of science, which he taught at Harvard, the University of California at Berkeley, Princeton University, and Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT).
In 1962, Kuhn published The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, which depicted the development of the basic natural sciences in an innovative way. According to Kuhn, the sciences do not uniformly progress strictly by scientific method. Rather, there are two fundamentally different phases of scientific development in the sciences. In the first phase, scientists work within a paradigm (set of accepted beliefs). When the foundation of the paradigm weakens and new theories and scientific methods begin to replace it, the next phase of scientific discovery takes place. Kuhn believes that scientific progress—that is, progress from one paradigm to another—has no logical reasoning. Kuhn's theory has triggered widespread, controversial discussion across many scientific disciplines.
不得不说,很赞的一本书。因为以前好像从没专门看过科哲的书,所以很有启发,揭示了科学作为学科本身的很多现象。 昨天看书看到一半又去看了好多遍《决战量子之巅》,看B站弹幕感觉大家都特别怀念那个伟大的时代。以前看《量子物理史话》的时候作者好像也说,活在那个时代的人...
评分常在自然科学、社会科学当中看到范式一词,那么范式究竟是什么意思呢?本文旨在探讨自然科学中范式的概念。 最早提出自然科学提出范式一词的人是科学哲学家托马斯·库恩(Thomas Kunn) 提出并在《科学革命的结构》(The Structure of Scientific Revolutions)(1962)中系...
评分科学的本来面目——浅读库恩《科学革命的结构》 科学革命的结构 The Structure of Scientific Revolutions [美]托马斯·库恩 Thomas S.Kuhn [译]金吾伦 胡新和 北京大学出版社 ISBN 7-301-06100-5 我清楚地记得,上中学的时候物理老师说,牛顿力学是量子力学在常规条件下的近...
评分如果要举出一位最有影响力的科学哲学家,非库恩莫属。单凭「范式」这一概念在各种理论之间随处可见、遍地开花,便足以见得其大红大紫,怕是再无他人能比。的确,「范式」的提出富有创见,在科学哲学与科学史上都具有里程碑的意义,却不免有诸般疏漏;然而库恩后来几次修正,也...
学科学出身的人,表述确实清晰许多
评分经典。范式与范式间的不可通约性,决定了学科自身知识体系的积累与成型,最后走至僵化而限制了学科的发展,这也解释了为什么好的研究大多都出自本学科之外,范式更迭并不意味着进步,也没有明确目标,像进化一样是物竞天择的过程。科学变革如社会变革一样不可能在体制框架内部完成,也不是积累的而是突变的,作者反对波普尔的“科学是拥有可证伪性”,认为任何范式都不可能在所有条件下成立,而评价范式的标准不是看它在绝对意义上多大程度接近真实(这并非科学目标)而是在相对意义上若干竞争的范式里择取最能吻合真实并解决问题的范式。是verification-falsification双重过程。不是范式决定视角,而是已有经验与视角形塑范式,进而形塑问题本身和得出的结论。不同范式引出的问题是不同的,对同一概念的使用其实内涵外延不同
评分社会学可以杀死哲学(Hegel),给了科学(Physical Science)致命一击(Kuhn),又曾对文学下手(Moretti),不知有没有被其他杀死的一天啊,比如生物?
评分北京大学研究生必修课自然辩证法推荐读物 补标记
评分这次读Kuhn明白了一件事:为什么给可爱的本科生小朋友们讲postcolonial theory讲了一学期他们还是在用modernization theory写essay——在不同的范式之间做出选择,这关乎信仰!
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有