Transcendental Ontology in German Idealism: Schelling and Hegel sheds remarkable light on a question central to post-Kantian philosophy: after the Copernican Revolution in philosophy, what can philosophy say about the world or reality as such? What remains of ontology's task after Kant? This is a question often overlooked in contemporary scholarship on German Idealism.
Markus Gabriel offers a refreshing reinvigoration of a range of questions concerning scepticism, corporeality, freedom, the question of being, the absolute and the modal status of our determinations and judgments, all crucial to our understanding of the truly radical nature of post-Kantian philosophy. Gabriel's assessment of the experiments undertaken in post-Kantian ontology reaffirms Schelling's and Hegel's place at the heart of contemporary metaphysics. The book shows how far we still have to go in mining the thought of Hegel and Schelling and how exciting, as a result, we can expect twenty-first century philosophy to be.
具體描述
讀後感
評分
評分
評分
評分
用戶評價
現在看來，對我影響真的蠻大的。
评分關於模態的分析簡直炸裂。
评分值得關注的是，Gabriel如何以觀念論的資源來反思當代知識論和自然主義，他對反思模型的分析更像是為瞭確立一種屬於“知識”的本體論。
评分1. 把Heideggers Lichtung 解釋為domain of all domains。勇氣可嘉。2. 斷言某物實存＝斷言某物在某域裏實存。因此domain of all domains不是實存，因為它不在任何域中。這個策略不新鮮：Ted Sider（2014）Mereological Collapse Principle。But MCP entails Composition As Identity Thesis. CAI與Markus的結論截然相反。3. “在某域中實存”和“就某域實存”是兩碼事。
评分von Seinsüberschuss zu Weltüberschuss ...
相關圖書
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息，本站不存儲任何數據與內容，任何內容與數據均與本站無關，如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度，google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美書屋 版权所有