Matthew Calarco is Associate Professor of Philosophy at California State University, Fullerton.
Zoographies challenges the anthropocentrism of the Continental philosophical tradition and advances the position that, while some distinctions are valid, humans and animals are best viewed as part of an ontological whole. Matthew Calarco draws on ethological and evolutionary evidence and the work of Heidegger, who called for a radicalized responsibility toward all forms of life. He also turns to Levinas, who raised questions about the nature and scope of ethics; Agamben, who held the "anthropological machine" responsible for the horrors of the twentieth century; and Derrida, who initiated a nonanthropocentric ethics. Calarco concludes with a call for the abolition of classical versions of the human-animal distinction and asks that we devise new ways of thinking about and living with animals.
評分
評分
評分
評分
綫條太單一瞭,想以anthropocentrism為基礎展開批判,力道又不夠
评分噱頭很足。從海德格爾、列維納斯、阿甘本、德裏達談動物的文章為材料做論述。可惜正文的內容幾乎是introduction的擴寫,邏輯和結論都沒有更新的內容。整個畫圈圈。
评分綫條太單一瞭,想以anthropocentrism為基礎展開批判,力道又不夠
评分Necessary interrogation on why Derrida insists on a radical discontinuity between human and the animals. Insistence on a non-essential, multiplying, even abyssmal difference is not just between human and the animals, but rather among all living beings, of which humans are but one example, in order to to secure that radical singularity of the Other.
评分Necessary interrogation on why Derrida insists on a radical discontinuity between human and the animals. Insistence on a non-essential, multiplying, even abyssmal difference is not just between human and the animals, but rather among all living beings, of which humans are but one example, in order to to secure that radical singularity of the Other.
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美書屋 版权所有