Matthew Calarco is Associate Professor of Philosophy at California State University, Fullerton.
Zoographies challenges the anthropocentrism of the Continental philosophical tradition and advances the position that, while some distinctions are valid, humans and animals are best viewed as part of an ontological whole. Matthew Calarco draws on ethological and evolutionary evidence and the work of Heidegger, who called for a radicalized responsibility toward all forms of life. He also turns to Levinas, who raised questions about the nature and scope of ethics; Agamben, who held the "anthropological machine" responsible for the horrors of the twentieth century; and Derrida, who initiated a nonanthropocentric ethics. Calarco concludes with a call for the abolition of classical versions of the human-animal distinction and asks that we devise new ways of thinking about and living with animals.
评分
评分
评分
评分
线条太单一了,想以anthropocentrism为基础展开批判,力道又不够
评分线条太单一了,想以anthropocentrism为基础展开批判,力道又不够
评分Necessary interrogation on why Derrida insists on a radical discontinuity between human and the animals. Insistence on a non-essential, multiplying, even abyssmal difference is not just between human and the animals, but rather among all living beings, of which humans are but one example, in order to to secure that radical singularity of the Other.
评分噱头很足。从海德格尔、列维纳斯、阿甘本、德里达谈动物的文章为材料做论述。可惜正文的内容几乎是introduction的扩写,逻辑和结论都没有更新的内容。整个画圈圈。
评分噱头很足。从海德格尔、列维纳斯、阿甘本、德里达谈动物的文章为材料做论述。可惜正文的内容几乎是introduction的扩写,逻辑和结论都没有更新的内容。整个画圈圈。
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有