Super Freakonomics pdf epub mobi txt 电子书下载 2025

简体网页||繁体网页

☆☆☆☆☆

作者：(美国)斯蒂夫•列维特 (美国)斯蒂芬•都伯纳译者：曾贤明

史蒂芬•列维特，芝加哥大学经济学教授，荣获约翰•贝茨•克拉克奖——这是一个只颁发给40岁以下影响力最大的经济学家的奖项。列维特在2006年被《时代》杂志评选为“全球最具影响力的一百人之一”。

史蒂芬•都伯纳，《纽约时报杂志》前撰稿人、编辑。著有《骚动的灵魂》，《一个英雄崇拜者的自白》，另著有儿童图书《长两个肚脐眼的男孩》。

出版者:William Morrow

作者:Steven D. Levitt

出品人:

页数:288

译者:

出版时间:2009

价格:0

装帧:

isbn号码:9781554686087

丛书系列:

图书标签:

经济学
SuperFreakonomics
经济
Levitt
Economics
心理学
原版
好想读

下载链接在页面底部

facebook linkedin mastodon messenger pinterest reddit telegram twitter viber vkontakte whatsapp 复制链接

想要找书就要到小美书屋

book.quotespace.org

立刻按 ctrl+D收藏本页

你会得到大惊喜!!

The New York Times best-selling Freakonomics was a worldwide sensation, selling over four million copies in thirty-five languages and changing the way we look at the world. Now, Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner return with SuperFreakonomics, and fans and newcomers alike will find that the freakquel is even bolder, funnier, and more surprising than the first.

Four years in the making, SuperFreakonomics asks not only the tough questions, but the unexpected ones: What's more dangerous, driving drunk or walking drunk? Why is chemotherapy prescribed so often if it's so ineffective? Can a sex change boost your salary?

SuperFreakonomics challenges the way we think all over again, exploring the hidden side of everything with such questions as:

How is a street prostitute like a department-store Santa?

Why are doctors so bad at washing their hands?

How much good do car seats do?

What's the best way to catch a terrorist?

Did TV cause a rise in crime?

What do hurricanes, heart attacks, and highway deaths have in common?

Are people hard-wired for altruism or selfishness?

Can eating kangaroo save the planet?

Which adds more value: a pimp or a Realtor?

Levitt and Dubner mix smart thinking and great storytelling like no one else, whether investigating a solution to global warming or explaining why the price of oral sex has fallen so drastically. By examining how people respond to incentives, they show the world for what it really is – good, bad, ugly, and, in the final analysis, super freaky.

Freakonomics has been imitated many times over – but only now, with SuperFreakonomics, has it met its match.