Is justice an ideal, forever beyond our grasp, or something that may actually guide our practical decisions and enhance our lives?In this wide-ranging book, Amartya Sen presents an alternative approach to mainstream theories of justice which, despite their many specific achievements have taken us, he argues, in the wrong direction in general. At the heart of Sen’s argument is his insistence on the role of public reason in establishing what can make societies less unjust. But it is in the nature of reasoning about justice, argues Sen, that it does not allow all questions to be settled even in theory; there are choices to be faced between alternative assessments of what is reasonable; several different and competing positions can each be well-defended.Far from rejecting such pluralities or trying to reduce them beyond the limits of reasoning, we should make use of them to construct a theory of justice that can absorb divergent points of view. Sen also shows how concern about the principles of justice in the modern world must avoid parochialism, and further, address questions of global injustice. The breadth of vision, intellectual acuity and striking humanity of one of the world's leading public intellectuals have never been more clearly shown than in this remarkable book.
1998年諾貝爾經濟學奬獲得者
阿马蒂亚·森不是专业哲学家,但是每次森发言,哲学家们都竖着耳朵在认真听。2009年森再次向哲学界投出了一颗重磅炸弹——厚达500页的《正义观》(The Idea of Justice),并在伦敦政治与经济学院、哈佛大学和牛津大学等学术重镇展开巡回演讲,所到之处群贤毕至,少长咸集,尽...
評分 評分阿马蒂亚·森不是专业哲学家,但是每次森发言,哲学家们都竖着耳朵在认真听。2009年森再次向哲学界投出了一颗重磅炸弹——厚达500页的《正义观》(The Idea of Justice),并在伦敦政治与经济学院、哈佛大学和牛津大学等学术重镇展开巡回演讲,所到之处群贤毕至,少长咸集,尽...
評分之所以選擇《正義的理念》這本看似枯燥無味的大書,以及接觸一個從不瞭解的印度作家阿馬蒂亞森,實在要責怪美國哈佛大學的一位謝頂的教授。Michael J. Sandel博士在他那座無虛席的大講堂里所做的《公正 該如何做是好》的課程實在是迷人極了。於是興衝衝地選擇了這本大書,其後...
評分之所以選擇《正義的理念》這本看似枯燥無味的大書,以及接觸一個從不瞭解的印度作家阿馬蒂亞森,實在要責怪美國哈佛大學的一位謝頂的教授。Michael J. Sandel博士在他那座無虛席的大講堂里所做的《公正 該如何做是好》的課程實在是迷人極了。於是興衝衝地選擇了這本大書,其後...
Love the introduction. I probably like Nussbaum more than Sen, but they have different perspectives based on their other identities.
评分吐個槽,當然很可能是我還沒看懂:鑽牛角尖鑽齣一本書,嚼一句話嚼齣一本書。大段大段的論述不如一個數學定理來得痛快。Sen不能用數學恐怕自己也很痛苦吧。
评分:無
评分justice should be considered with respect to what actually happens in real world as opposed to metaphysics arguments and idealized concepts
评分今天你自由瞭麼? 還是比較textbooky的一本書,不過作為poli sci入門書,應該是不錯念
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美書屋 版权所有