When should the United States go to war?
It is arguably the most important foreign policy question facing any president, and Richard Haass—a member of the National Security Council staff for the first President Bush and the director of policy planning in the State Department for Bush II—is in a unique position to address it. Haass is one of just a handful of individuals—along with Colin Powell, Dick Cheney, Paul Wolfowitz, and Bob Gates—involved at a senior level of U.S. government decision-making during both Iraq conflicts. He is the first to take us behind closed doors and the first to provide a personal account. The result is a book that is authoritative, revealing, and surprising. Haass explains not only what happened but why.
At first blush, the two Iraq wars appear similar. Both involved a President George Bush and the United States in conflicts with Saddam Hussein and Iraq. There, however, the resemblance ends. Haass contrasts the decisions that shaped the conduct of the two wars and makes a crucial distinction between the 1991 and 2003 conflicts. The first Iraq war, following Saddam Hussein’s invasion of neighboring Kuwait, was a war of necessity. It was limited in ambition, well executed, and carried out with unprecedented international support. By contrast, the second Iraq war was one of choice, the most significant discretionary war undertaken by the United States since Vietnam. Haass argues that it was unwarranted, as the United States had other viable policy options. Making matters worse was the fact that this ambitious undertaking was poorly implemented and fought with considerably more international opposition than backing.
These are the principal conclusions of this compelling, honest, and challenging book by one of this country’s most respected voices on foreign policy. Haass’s assessments are critical yet fair—and carry tremendous weight. He offers a thoughtful examination of the means and ends of U.S. foreign policy: how it should be made, what it should seek to accomplish, and how it should be pursued. War of Necessity, War of Choice—part history, part memoir—provides invaluable insight into some of the most important recent events in the world. It also provides a much-needed compass for how the United States can apply the lessons learned from the two Iraq wars so that it is better positioned to put into practice what worked and to avoid repeating what so clearly did not.
President of Council on Foreign Relations, a major thinktank in the United States.
评分
评分
评分
评分
这本书给我的感受,更像是在与一位学识渊博、洞察力超群的智者进行一次长时间的深度对话。作者的口吻非常客观公正,没有明显的情感倾向,但字里行间流淌出的那种对历史规律的敬畏感和对人类命运的关切,是无法掩饰的。我特别欣赏他对于“偶然性”在历史中作用的审慎态度,他承认运气和意想不到的变量会颠覆最精密的计划,但同时也坚信,只有充分准备的头脑才能抓住偶然降临的机遇。通篇读下来,我感受到了一种强烈的智力上的挑战和思想上的洗礼,它不是那种轻松愉快的读物,它要求读者投入心神,去辨析那些看似微小却能引发蝴蝶效应的要素。这本书成功地将学术研究的严谨性与大众阅读的吸引力完美结合,读完后,我对理解现代世界的运作机制,多了一层深刻而有力的透镜。
评分这本书的语言风格简直是一场文字的盛宴,充满了古典的韵味却又毫不晦涩难懂,读起来有一种沉浸式的体验。作者似乎对语言的掌控达到了炉火纯青的地步,他擅长使用排比和象征性的意象来烘托气氛,尤其是在描绘那些决定性的冲突场面时,笔力遒劲,画面感极强,仿佛能闻到硝烟味,听到号角声。但最让我惊艳的是,作者在严肃的历史论述中,巧妙地穿插了一些富含哲理的沉思片段,这些片段并非生硬的插入,而是自然地从事件的逻辑中流淌出来,引导读者进行更深层次的反思。这种文学性和思想性的完美融合,使得阅读过程充满了智力上的愉悦。我甚至会时不时地停下来,反复咀嚼某些段落的措辞,体会那种经过反复锤炼的文字力量。它成功地将一个宏大的历史主题,用最优雅且有力量的方式呈现出来,绝非寻常的史书所能比拟。
评分翻开这本新书,首先映入眼帘的是那种沉甸甸的历史厚重感,作者的叙事风格如同在娓娓道来一场跨越时代的史诗,每一个转折点都处理得极其精妙。我尤其欣赏他对于复杂人性微妙之处的捕捉,那些在宏大叙事背景下被忽略的个体挣扎与抉择,被描摹得入木三分。书中对于权力更迭中信息不对称所导致的误判,进行了深入的剖析,读来让人不禁拍案叫绝。他没有简单地将历史人物脸谱化,而是用细腻的笔触勾勒出他们的矛盾与局限,使得整个故事群像鲜活立体起来。尤其是在处理关键的战略部署和外交博弈时,作者展现出了深厚的专业素养,那种对细节的执着,让即便是历史爱好者也感到满足。整本书的节奏把握得极佳,时而如急流般推进,将读者卷入事件的中心,时而又放缓节奏,让人有机会沉淀思考那些深层次的社会结构性问题。那种对历史进程的深刻洞察,使得这本书不仅仅是记录,更像是一种对人类行为模式的哲学探讨。
评分作为一个对地缘政治和决策科学感兴趣的读者,我发现这本书的分析框架极为新颖和具有启发性。作者并没有停留在对既有史实的简单罗列,而是构建了一套独特的分析模型,用来解构特定历史节点上,决策者们所面临的内在约束和外部压力。他对于信息处理的缺陷、群体思维的盲区,以及领导者个人气质对国家走向的塑形作用,探讨得极其透彻。书中对于资源分配与战略机遇窗口的论述,更是充满了实战智慧,读来让人对“时机”二字的价值有了全新的认知。我能感受到作者在资料搜集上的广度和深度,那些不为人知的档案细节被巧妙地引入叙事,为他提出的论点提供了坚实的支撑。这本书提供了一种看待冲突和抉择的全新视角,它迫使你跳出非黑即白的简单判断,去理解“为什么会是这样”背后的复杂逻辑链条,非常适合那些寻求深度思考的读者。
评分我得说,这本书的结构设计堪称教科书级别,行文流畅,逻辑严密得令人赞叹。作者很擅长在不同时间维度之间进行穿梭,从宏观的历史大势回溯到微观的个人会晤,再从事件的后果展望到最初的动机萌芽,这种多维度的叙事手法,极大地增强了故事的张力。阅读过程中,我几乎找不到任何可以称之为“拖沓”的部分,每一个章节的过渡都像是精心设计过的转场,自然而然地将读者的注意力引向下一个关键节点。特别值得称道的是,作者在收尾部分的处理,没有给出一个简单的总结性陈词,而是留下了一个开放性的、引人深思的尾声,这使得书本的讨论范围得以延伸到合上封皮之后,继续在读者的脑海中发酵。这种结构上的严谨与灵活并存,体现了作者极高的驾驭能力,让阅读体验充满了高效和满足感。
评分老布什部分尚可,小布什的部分完全像是小孩撒娇
评分老布什部分尚可,小布什的部分完全像是小孩撒娇
评分老布什部分尚可,小布什的部分完全像是小孩撒娇
评分老布什部分尚可,小布什的部分完全像是小孩撒娇
评分老布什部分尚可,小布什的部分完全像是小孩撒娇
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有