Calamity and Reform in China pdf epub mobi txt 电子书下载 2024

☆☆☆☆☆
简体网页||繁体网页

Dali Yang

Stanford University Press

1998-8-1

368

USD 30.95

Paperback

9780804734707

图书标签: 政治学中国研究杨大利大饥荒中国政治比较政治威权主义海外中国研究

喜欢 Calamity and Reform in China 的读者还喜欢

下载链接在页面底部

点击这里下载

facebook linkedin mastodon messenger pinterest reddit telegram twitter viber vkontakte whatsapp 复制链接

想要找书就要到小哈图书下载中心

qciss.net

立刻按 ctrl+D收藏本页

你会得到大惊喜!!

发表于2024-12-26

Calamity and Reform in China epub 下载 mobi 下载 pdf 下载 txt 电子书下载 2024

Calamity and Reform in China pdf epub mobi txt 电子书下载 2024

图书描述

China's Great Leap Famine of 1959-61 resulted in 30 million deaths, making it easily the worst famine in human history. Yet unlike the Cultural Revolution - that other massive catastrophe of Mao's rule - the Great Leap Forward has received scant scholarly attention. This is partly because victims of the ensuing famine were inarticulate farmers and partly because many key players in that inglorious era are members of the current elite who tightly guard the archives. Despite these impediments, the author has marshalled an impressive array of historical documents to provide the first comprehensive treatment of the political causes and consequences of the Great Leap Famine. The Famine is important because it furnished the crucial historical motives for dismantling the rural collective institutional structure in post-Mao China two decades later and motivating tens of millions of ordinary Chinese to enact the reforms.

Calamity and Reform in China 下载 mobi epub pdf txt 电子书

著者简介

Dali L. Yang is Professor and Chairman in the Department of Political Science at the University of Chicago.

图书目录

Calamity and Reform in China pdf epub mobi txt 电子书下载

想要找书就要到小哈图书下载中心

qciss.net

立刻按 ctrl+D收藏本页

你会得到大惊喜!!

用户评价

评分☆☆☆☆☆

不管论证的内容是否会被后续史料逐渐修正，故事和逻辑绝对是非常精彩的。

评分☆☆☆☆☆

我认为这是要了解大饥荒和农村变革的不可缺少的英文文献。这本书框架清晰，结合了社科的多种研究方法，也没有过分贪心地沉醉于历史细节，非常适合摘选章节给那种没啥中国背景的学生做课后阅读。更难能可贵的是，Yang围绕大饥荒的产生及其政治、社会遗产讲的这个故事非常完整。我信了。可与David Zweig的Agrarian Radicalism 配合服用。

评分☆☆☆☆☆

一种解释

评分☆☆☆☆☆

能读到作者的关怀，理论逻辑上说得通，然而证据不足以支撑。写作上更像史学