Neo-Confucianism in History pdf epub mobi txt 电子书下载 2025

☆☆☆☆☆

包弼德（Peter K. Bol）是美国哈佛大学东亚语言与文明系的查理斯•卡威尔（Charles H. Carswell）讲座教授，他同时也主持哈佛大学《中国历史地理信息系统》(Chinese Historical GIS) 以及《中国历代人物传记资料库》（Chinese Biographical Database）等大型数据库的建设工作。其著作包括 This Culture of Ours: Intellectual Transitions in T'ang and Sung China (1992，中译本《斯文：唐宋思想的转型》)，并合编Emperor Huizong and Late Northern Song China: The Politics of Culture and the Culture of Politics (2006) 以及Confucianism and Ecology (1998) 等书。包弼德最近十余年的研究专注于讨论理学的历史角色，以及从地方史的视角出发探讨中国社会文化的变迁。

出版者:Harvard University Asia Center

作者:Peter K. Bol

出品人:

页数:450

译者:

出版时间:2008-11-30

价格:USD 49.95

装帧:Hardcover

isbn号码:9780674031067

丛书系列:The Harvard East Asian Monographs

图书标签:

思想史
海外中国研究
理学
Bol
历史
包弼德
社会史
海外漢學

下载链接在页面底部

facebook linkedin mastodon messenger pinterest reddit telegram twitter viber vkontakte whatsapp 复制链接

想要找书就要到小美书屋

book.quotespace.org

立刻按 ctrl+D收藏本页

你会得到大惊喜!!

Where does Neo-Confucianism - a movement that from the twelfth to the seventeenth centuries profoundly influenced the way people understood the world and responded to it - fit into our story of China's history?This interpretive, at times polemical, inquiry into the Neo-Confucian engagement with the literati as the social and political elite, local society, and the imperial state during the Song, Yuan, and Ming dynasties is also a reflection on the role of the middle period in China's history. The book argues that as Neo-Confucians put their philosophy of learning into practice in local society, they justified a new social ideal in which society at the local level was led by the literati with state recognition and support. The later imperial order, in which the state accepted local elite leadership as necessary to its own existence, survived even after Neo-Confucianism lost its hold on the center of intellectual culture in the seventeenth century but continued as the foundation of local education. It is the contention of this book that Neo-Confucianism made that order possible.

具体描述

读后感

评分☆☆☆☆☆

很不错的一本书，对问题的分析还是切中肯綮的，至少没有其他某些老外的“隔离”。作者把理学至于广阔的背景下加以考察，清晰地勾勒出其发生发展的脉络。细节方面值得称道处亦不少：比如，作者认为，不应该把汉学和宋学的差异仅仅分析成重训诂和重义理的二元对立。又如，作者认...

评分☆☆☆☆☆

《历史上的理学》是第一部在公元11世纪至17世纪的政治、经济、社会和文化变迁的大背景下，详细地阐释理学的萌发、兴盛和末落的著作。包弼德教授在进行这项研究方面具有得天独厚的优势。他对于中国政治史和社会经济史领域的前沿进展有深透的了解。他严谨地将理学界定为一种道德...

评分☆☆☆☆☆

Taizong (r. 976-97), turned their attention to state building: defining the border, controlling independent military governors, recruiting civil administrators, regularizing tax collection and military provisioning, and re-establishing a national legal syst...

评分☆☆☆☆☆

...抄录一些原话. ... What clearly is the case is that the court rarely again tried---and when it did, it failed---to overhaul its institutions so that the state apparatus became the active agent in transforming society in the manner of the New Policies of ...

评分☆☆☆☆☆