What makes good people do bad things? How can moral people be seduced to act immorally? Where is the line separating good from evil, and who is in danger of crossing it?
Renowned social psychologist Philip Zimbardo has the answers, and in The Lucifer Effect he explains how–and the myriad reasons why–we are all susceptible to the lure of “the dark side.” Drawing on examples from history as well as his own trailblazing research, Zimbardo details how situational forces and group dynamics can work in concert to make monsters out of decent men and women.
Zimbardo is perhaps best known as the creator of the Stanford Prison Experiment. Here, for the first time and in detail, he tells the full story of this landmark study, in which a group of college-student volunteers was randomly divided into “guards” and “inmates” and then placed in a mock prison environment. Within a week the study was abandoned, as ordinary college students were transformed into either brutal, sadistic guards or emotionally broken prisoners.
By illuminating the psychological causes behind such disturbing metamorphoses, Zimbardo enables us to better understand a variety of harrowing phenomena, from corporate malfeasance to organized genocide to how once upstanding American soldiers came to abuse and torture Iraqi detainees in Abu Ghraib. He replaces the long-held notion of the “bad apple” with that of the “bad barrel”–the idea that the social setting and the system contaminate the individual, rather than the other way around.
This is a book that dares to hold a mirror up to mankind, showing us that we might not be who we think we are. While forcing us to reexamine what we are capable of doing when caught up in the crucible of behavioral dynamics, though, Zimbardo also offers hope. We are capable of resisting evil, he argues, and can even teach ourselves to act heroically. Like Hannah Arendt’s Eichmann in Jerusalem and Steven Pinker’s The Blank Slate, The Lucifer Effect is a shocking, engrossing study that will change the way we view human behavior.
From the Hardcover edition.
菲利普·津巴多(Philip Zimbardo,1933-)毕业于耶鲁大学,曾先后执教于耶鲁大学、纽约大学、哥伦比亚大学和斯坦福大学,现为斯坦福大学心理学系荣退教授。他的《害羞》(Shyness)、《心理学与生活》(Psychology and Life,与 Richard Gerrig合著)两书总销量已逾250万本。津巴多曾任美国心理学会主席,现任斯坦福大学恐怖主义跨领域政策、教育与研究中心主任。他编创了美国公共电视台的获奖节目《探索心理学》(Discovering Psychology),并在片中担任主持人。2004年,他应邀担任伊拉克阿布格莱布监狱美军虐囚案的专家证人。由于津巴多教授四十多年来在心理学研究和教学领域的杰出贡献,美国心理学会特向他颁发了希尔加德(Ernest R.Hilgard)普通心理学终身成就奖。
金巴多教授为了了解一般人如何受到情境力量影响,于是在史丹佛大学规划了实验监狱的计画,征求自愿者扮演狱卒与囚犯两种角色,毛遂自荐者事前不知自己分配到何种角色,为了增加实验的真实性,金巴多加入了「逮捕行动」的流程,甚至让自愿者的家属信以为真。 这群受试者没有...
评分梁文道讲《路西法效应》 一 1994年的卢旺达大屠杀在三个月之内,胡图族人杀死了大概80万到100万的图西族人,是三个月的时间死了将近100万人,凶器是一些大砍刀跟狼牙棒,这很可能是现代历史上最被忽略,但是又最残暴的一桩大屠杀。 这个屠杀的发生现在看起来是非常匪夷所思的...
评分 评分理智的本质是计算 这计算不必非要借助数字不可 因为关于大小多少的概念对于人是很自然的 不理智有两种 不计算和失算 民风彪悍的各种蛮子属于不计算 失算有两种 计算的过程错误 计算的预值错误 所谓过程错误 比如作为狱警 明明知道不可以打死人 结果还是打死了 结果...
评分开始看这本书的初衷,看到一个新闻,http://weibo.com/2710875561/BlHMDuouv?mod=weibotime&type=comment#_rnd1410405139248,SPE(Stanford Prison Experiment的简称)存在实验的缺陷,好奇之下就想具体了解一下这个实验本身的缺陷。记得津巴多教授在《路西法效应》中...
津巴多名作
评分在暗示中人性的變遷
评分If it's not for to let light into the dungeon, there will be no point to start this journey into darkness. Likely the most unethical experiment ever, Zimbardo’s research along with series of experiments by his predecessors entailing synopsis of situational ethics is an attempt for sustaining our pursuit for integrity and kindness for all humanity.
评分真的 不如讀paper來的爽快 或者看前幾個chapter然後直接看spe電影就可以了吧 後面講的也太詳細了 急死人也再出不來乾貨了
评分真的 不如讀paper來的爽快 或者看前幾個chapter然後直接看spe電影就可以了吧 後面講的也太詳細了 急死人也再出不來乾貨了
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有