A major reimagining of how evolutionary forces work, revealing how mating preferences—what Darwin termed “the taste for the beautiful”—create the extraordinary range of ornament in the animal world.
In the great halls of science, dogma holds that Darwin’s theory of natural selection explains every branch on the tree of life: which species thrive, which wither away to extinction, and what features each evolves. But can adaptation by natural selection really account for everything we see in nature?
Yale University ornithologist Richard Prum—reviving Darwin’s own views—thinks not. Deep in tropical jungles around the world are birds with a dizzying array of appearances and mating displays: Club-winged Manakins who sing with their wings, Great Argus Pheasants who dazzle prospective mates with a four-foot-wide cone of feathers covered in golden 3D spheres, Red-capped Manakins who moonwalk. In thirty years of fieldwork, Prum has seen numerous display traits that seem disconnected from, if not outright contrary to, selection for individual survival. To explain this, he dusts off Darwin’s long-neglected theory of sexual selection in which the act of choosing a mate for purely aesthetic reasons—for the mere pleasure of it—is an independent engine of evolutionary change.
Mate choice can drive ornamental traits from the constraints of adaptive evolution, allowing them to grow ever more elaborate. It also sets the stakes for sexual conflict, in which the sexual autonomy of the female evolves in response to male sexual control. Most crucially, this framework provides important insights into the evolution of human sexuality, particularly the ways in which female preferences have changed male bodies, and even maleness itself, through evolutionary time.
The Evolution of Beauty presents a unique scientific vision for how nature’s splendor contributes to a more complete understanding of evolution and of ourselves.
Richard O. Prum is William Robertson Coe Professor of Ornithology at Yale University, and Head Curator of Vertebrate Zoology at the Yale Peabody Museum of Natural History. He has conducted field work throughout the world, and has studied fossil theropod dinosaurs in China. He received a MacArthur Fellowship in 2010.
The Evolution of Beauty 英文版刚刚上市时,我就在不少国外科普媒体上注意到了它。当时我还算半个“自由撰稿人”(说的太好听了,实际上就是四处给别人码点儿字写科普),对自然博物类科普的话题一直很感兴趣。这本书一经出版便受到了学界与科普界的高度关注,随之而来的则是...
评分11/03/2017 最近看到有人提起,就贴过来吧。 刚听这本书时候的一点小片段。其实后面的内容不止这些,蛮有趣的。 昨天煮饭时听到一段关于duck sex的内容,差点笑喷了,很有意思也很有意义,所以要记一下。 前面都在讲鸟儿们的迁徙特性、羽毛和歌声,narrator还时不时学学鸟叫。...
评分一 关于阅读本书的乐趣和价值 这本书的阅读是非常有趣的,无论是大道理还是小事例,都不断激发着我的脑电波。我以为很多社会风潮、流行言论、社会现象,都可以在这本书中,从非人动物那里找到相似、甚至一模一样的现象,于是接下来是欣慰还是惊醒就看个人的悟性了。这种跨物种...
评分2015年11月某天的傍晚,一位德国鸟类学者望着灯火辉煌,船来车往的外滩,发出了”痛心疾首“的感慨:想想我们人类浪费了多少资源在没有实用价值的东西上!我当时毫不犹豫地反驳:可是动物也是一样啊,想想有些鸟的羽毛。他听罢一笑算是接受了上海的“骄奢”。 而这本书的个例部...
评分因为想多知道一些关于evolution的知识,就读了这本书,结果对于鸟类研究更有兴趣了。Pheasant, manakin,bird of paradise,我们总是认为其他动物都比人类或者哺乳动物低级,而这些鸟类复杂的社会行为,却不是我们我们能对低级动物的理解所解释的。鸟类是否也存在它们的审美标准呢?而这些审美标准,是否都是自然选择的结果呢?如果不是,那么这些标准又从何而来呢?这本书大部分的篇幅都是在说,这些审美标准,除去自然选择的部分,就是雌性对于美的认知和自由选择的一种方式,与适应性没关。然而现在的美,也有可能是曾经的适应性,这一点,似乎被作者略去了。雌性想要按照自己的意愿选择配偶,而不愿意被强迫,这一点,真是从未听说过的理论。虽然没法完全相信书里的内容,至少是打开了一点点思路。
评分A beautiful theory of beauty
评分因为想多知道一些关于evolution的知识,就读了这本书,结果对于鸟类研究更有兴趣了。Pheasant, manakin,bird of paradise,我们总是认为其他动物都比人类或者哺乳动物低级,而这些鸟类复杂的社会行为,却不是我们我们能对低级动物的理解所解释的。鸟类是否也存在它们的审美标准呢?而这些审美标准,是否都是自然选择的结果呢?如果不是,那么这些标准又从何而来呢?这本书大部分的篇幅都是在说,这些审美标准,除去自然选择的部分,就是雌性对于美的认知和自由选择的一种方式,与适应性没关。然而现在的美,也有可能是曾经的适应性,这一点,似乎被作者略去了。雌性想要按照自己的意愿选择配偶,而不愿意被强迫,这一点,真是从未听说过的理论。虽然没法完全相信书里的内容,至少是打开了一点点思路。
评分最后两章不行,私货过多。
评分有一些很有批判性的创见,但私货也不少,关键是说服力欠佳。
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有