A major reimagining of how evolutionary forces work, revealing how mating preferences—what Darwin termed “the taste for the beautiful”—create the extraordinary range of ornament in the animal world.
In the great halls of science, dogma holds that Darwin’s theory of natural selection explains every branch on the tree of life: which species thrive, which wither away to extinction, and what features each evolves. But can adaptation by natural selection really account for everything we see in nature?
Yale University ornithologist Richard Prum—reviving Darwin’s own views—thinks not. Deep in tropical jungles around the world are birds with a dizzying array of appearances and mating displays: Club-winged Manakins who sing with their wings, Great Argus Pheasants who dazzle prospective mates with a four-foot-wide cone of feathers covered in golden 3D spheres, Red-capped Manakins who moonwalk. In thirty years of fieldwork, Prum has seen numerous display traits that seem disconnected from, if not outright contrary to, selection for individual survival. To explain this, he dusts off Darwin’s long-neglected theory of sexual selection in which the act of choosing a mate for purely aesthetic reasons—for the mere pleasure of it—is an independent engine of evolutionary change.
Mate choice can drive ornamental traits from the constraints of adaptive evolution, allowing them to grow ever more elaborate. It also sets the stakes for sexual conflict, in which the sexual autonomy of the female evolves in response to male sexual control. Most crucially, this framework provides important insights into the evolution of human sexuality, particularly the ways in which female preferences have changed male bodies, and even maleness itself, through evolutionary time.
The Evolution of Beauty presents a unique scientific vision for how nature’s splendor contributes to a more complete understanding of evolution and of ourselves.
Richard O. Prum is William Robertson Coe Professor of Ornithology at Yale University, and Head Curator of Vertebrate Zoology at the Yale Peabody Museum of Natural History. He has conducted field work throughout the world, and has studied fossil theropod dinosaurs in China. He received a MacArthur Fellowship in 2010.
什么是美?谁来定义美?美在不同的时代与社会中又是如何变化的?美存在于人类社会,亦存在于动物界,假如美有人或动物中的某一部分个体或群体主导,那么这个主导的人是谁?——这些宏大的问题必然三言两语难以尽述,因此不妨化繁为简,从相对简单一些的鸟类谈起,这也便是《美...
评分我先写一个粗略的过过瘾。 这是一本很严肃的科普,虽然前面两章的内容有点偏于学术争论的历史脉络,无甚生物知识的读者会感到屡不清作者的思路,但后面就很平易近人了。 审美进化,是在假设非人动物与人有着相同的主观能动性的前提下,进而发现智能现象在两性选择活动中,作为...
评分2015年11月某天的傍晚,一位德国鸟类学者望着灯火辉煌,船来车往的外滩,发出了”痛心疾首“的感慨:想想我们人类浪费了多少资源在没有实用价值的东西上!我当时毫不犹豫地反驳:可是动物也是一样啊,想想有些鸟的羽毛。他听罢一笑算是接受了上海的“骄奢”。 而这本书的个例部...
评分 评分这本书重新发现和深化了达尔文的性选择进化论,指出雌性对于求偶者的审美是导致动物进化的核心力量,先于自然选择的拣选和淘汰。 达尔文认为雌性动物具有审美的本能,而雄性动物竭力通过展示魅力来取悦其性交对家。雌性动物确立了作为其种类的“美的标准”,具有符合这一标准之...
A beautiful theory of beauty
评分这本书从很多方面来说都和from bacteria to Bach and back很像。并非所有的trait都是自然选择,有性选择也有社会选择也发挥了作用。有些trait留下来并非好到适者生存,而是没有坏到不适生存。性选择主要的驱动力是女性自主权。按照Dennett的说法也许是competence without comprehension。但是读完后依旧会觉得有些理论证据是对方理论的不足之处,但没有自己的证明证据。我读这本书的时候很开心,但对从生物学里面moralizing始终感到矛盾。
评分A beautiful theory of beauty
评分我们所学的进化论很大程度上是华莱士的群体自然选择进化论,而达尔文的进化论更广泛,包括了美学,个体选择和自然选择等。现代科学对于美学有两个观点:统计大神Fisher的female choice和good genes(例如不利条件原则),作者更倾向于Fisher。最喜欢的作者的观点是:falling love is not game theory. Coevolution of aesthetic adaption and female choice have made it a deeply aesthetic experience that involves mutual social, cognitive, and physical seduction. 后几章关于女权和LGB也很有趣。
评分听的audible上的有声书,上一秒还在讲羽毛和歌声,下一秒就讲生殖器,没有目录看就是这么精彩。这本很喜欢了,female choice在进化过程中的作用,比我们想象的大,不一定是生理性的,还有文化层面的。同性性行为的原因。这种切片很容易被当成武断,但其实我们连切片断面都不懂。
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有