 
			 
				Technology and increasing levels of education have exposed people to more information than ever before. These societal gains, however, have also helped fuel a surge in narcissistic and misguided intellectual egalitarianism that has crippled informed debates on any number of issues. Today, everyone knows everything: with only a quick trip through WebMD or Wikipedia, average citizens believe themselves to be on an equal intellectual footing with doctors and diplomats. All voices, even the most ridiculous, demand to be taken with equal seriousness, and any claim to the contrary is dismissed as undemocratic elitism.
Tom Nichols' The Death of Expertise shows how this rejection of experts has occurred: the openness of the internet, the emergence of a customer satisfaction model in higher education, and the transformation of the news industry into a 24-hour entertainment machine, among other reasons. Paradoxically, the increasingly democratic dissemination of information, rather than producing an educated public, has instead created an army of ill-informed and angry citizens who denounce intellectual achievement. When ordinary citizens believe that no one knows more than anyone else, democratic institutions themselves are in danger of falling either to populism or to technocracy or, in the worst case, a combination of both. An update to the 2017breakout hit, the paperback edition of The Death of Expertise provides a new foreword to cover the alarming exacerbation of these trends in the aftermath of Donald Trump's election. Judging from events on the ground since it first published, The Death of Expertise issues a warning about the stability and survival of modern democracy in the Information Age that is even more important today.
Tom Nichols is Professor of National Security Affairs at the US Naval War College, an adjunct professor at the Harvard Extension School, and a former aide in the U.S. Senate. He is also the author of several works on foreign policy and international security affairs, including The Sacred Cause, No Use: Nuclear Weapons and U.S. National Security, Eve of Destruction: The Coming Age of Preventive War, and The Russian Presidency.
He is also a five-time undefeated Jeopardy! champion, and as one of the all-time top players of the game, he was invited back to play in the 2005 Ultimate Tournament of Champions. Nichols' website is tomnichols.net and he can be found on Twitter at @RadioFreeTom.
读完托马斯·M·尼科尔斯的《专家之死》,就观点的形式上,与尼尔波兹曼在《技术垄断》中的大多数观点相左。不过这两位的核心都是一样的,都表达出在现代传媒、娱乐、舆论的压力下,公众批判性思维的缺失以及社会中理性人被边缘化。核心都是一种反智主义,只是只上两种不同的归...
評分沒有寫得很深刻,但是在反智主義盛行的年代應該人手一本。 在YouTube搜一下進化論,最聳人聽聞的youtuber才有最多的點擊率(試想一下以下兩個標題哪個更吸引眼球:《進化論完全是錯誤的!驚天大陰謀》vs《進化論的前世今生》)。當娛樂取代了知識,網紅就取代專家。(國內重災...
評分其实反智是在美国人骨子里的一种习惯 与民主有关 与历史有关 这个观点我认同 但是同时我觉得本书夹杂了很多作者的私货(一个大学老师 专家 作者) 尤其在《大学》这一章中 作者提出 大学教育被资本化了 学生成了上帝(顾客) 学校的老师和员工则变成了要取悦顾客刺激消费的售货...
評分这是今年(2018)以来,我读过最尖锐但也最棒的一本针砭时事的作品。书名《专业之死》(The Death of Expertise)所指的,不是专业人士如今变得越来越不专业,也不是在互联网时代专业变得不再重要,而是指当前的美国社会越来越不尊重——甚至鄙夷——专业知识与人士。作者的写...
評分专家不是真的死了,而是专家被大多数人抵制,专业知识被大多数人抗拒系统学习,科学与客观理性被感觉、情绪和即时性技术需求所取代。这恐怕不仅仅是美国的问题,中国或者其他国家的读者恐怕也能在这本书中找到各自国家的影子。 造就“专家之死”的原因,作者阐述了很多,例如,...
創新2,內容2。 作者批判瞭美國的反智現象,頑固的自我無知。原因歸結為教育,互聯網和媒體的偏薄。有一點感觸深:網絡信息巨大,讓人産生容易掌握某領域知識的假象,但羅列事實不是真正的專業,需要深入學習和理解。
评分購買鏈接:https://item.taobao.com/item.htm?id=595764642710
评分對陰謀論也有分析。
评分getabs 反智和專傢的鬥爭,對互聯網的悲觀有點不贊同,對美國人傻很贊同
评分專傢會犯錯,但不信專傢更錯。
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美書屋 版权所有