In Queer Marxism in Two Chinas Petrus Liu rethinks the relationship between Marxism and queer cultures in mainland China and Taiwan. Whereas many scholars assume the emergence of queer cultures in China signals the end of Marxism and demonstrates China's political and economic evolution, Liu finds the opposite to be true. He challenges the persistence of Cold War formulations of Marxism that position it as intellectually incompatible with queer theory, and shows how queer Marxism offers a nonliberal alternative to Western models of queer emancipation. The work of queer Chinese artists and intellectuals not only provides an alternative to liberal ideologies of inclusion and diversity, but demonstrates how different conceptions of and attitudes toward queerness in China and Taiwan stem from geopolitical tensions. With Queer Marxism in Two Chinas Liu offers a revision to current understandings of what queer theory is, does, and can be.
Petrus Liu is Associate Professor of Humanities at Yale-NUS College and the author of Stateless Subjects: Chinese Martial Arts Literature and Postcolonial History.
評分
評分
評分
評分
中國酷兒作為方法。將非身份的酷兒理論與非國傢的馬剋思主義結閤,對抗自由主義與殖民主義潮流,強調結構性、係統性的不平等權力的分配與再生産,而非不斷細化、孤立的身份政治。酷兒馬剋思主義的優勢在於將酷兒主義的多樣性寓於馬剋思主義的整體性當中,求同存異,有鬥爭有聯閤。個人覺得,雖然女權、後殖民也都能跟馬剋思聯閤,但相比女權,酷兒馬剋思主義更多元(畢竟性嚮還是比性彆更靈活),相比後殖民,則更關注規模的問題(比如國傢內、社區內甚至傢庭內的暴力)。本書提供一種思考方法而非具體理論,可能會讓很多讀者失望。
评分題目取得太大,其實隻講瞭颱灣,內地在本書裏基本上是完全缺席,文學解讀部分也挺糟糕的
评分所以作者你想在一個180頁的書裏寫完馬剋思寫Queer理論再寫中國大陸再寫颱灣還要順帶談一談文化發展?!略貪心吧。以及,你到底是想講marx呢還是講大中華還是想說marx在大中華的運用和發展?Two Chinas又是個什麼鬼?!七八十年代的大陸和颱灣文化發展真的可以放一起做個parallel?!你講中國大陸的同性戀真的可以不提毛時代?!感覺被這本書的intro忽悠瞭。
评分題目取得太大,其實隻講瞭颱灣,內地在本書裏基本上是完全缺席,文學解讀部分也挺糟糕的
评分網上隻找得到intro和chap1,單看這兩個部分還是不錯的
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美書屋 版权所有