图书标签: 社会学 帝国学 中國民族誌
发表于2024-11-04
The Imperial Metaphor pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载 2024
A basic fact of Chinese social life and history is the institution of territorial cults and their festivals. They are highpoints of social life. They portray and punctuate a sense of life and death and present a whole picture of Chinese political relations as seen at their popular roots. The images of demons and ghosts and those of protectors against them which festivals and their temples display, are an organisation of Chinese local identification and provide an insight into everyday life and belief in China. It has come to be expected that religions can be named like identities of nations and cultures, or at least knowable doctrines, but Chinese popular religion has no name. It is not a religion of a book, nor is it the named religion of China - Daoism. The popular religion includes some elements of both Buddhism and the imperial cults, more of Daoism, but it is identifiable with none of them.
It is a religion of the common people, but not 'of the people' in the sense of a national population's mass culture. It is popular in the sense of being local and true of the China of the Han, or Chinese-speaking people, where every place had or has its local cults and the festivals peculiar to them. The custom of local festivals and temples is not as well known as that of ancestor worship and clan and lineage, but Stephan Feuchtwang shows that it is as distinctive an institution. The Imperial Metaphor will be of great interest to anthropologists, historians, students of religious studies, and Chinese and China Studies, as well as the general reader.
王斯福(Stephan Feuchtwang)现为伦敦经济学院(LSE)人类学系兼职教授。研究领域包括人类学理论与中国民间宗教、各文明之比较研究与历史人类学。最近的出版物包括有其作为主编的论文集《制造地点:国家计划、全球化与中国的地方反应》(Making Place: State projects, globalisation and local responses in China, UCL Press 2004)、与王铭铭合写的著作《基层卡理斯玛:中国的四种地方领袖》(Grassroots Charisma: Four local leaders in China, Routledge 2001),另外,还有最近发表在《皇家人类学刊》上的论文“论作为顺从与过度交流的宗教仪式”('On religious ritual as deference and excessive communication' Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 2007 vol 13 no 1 pp 57-72)。曾经担任过英国中国研究学会会长(1999—2002),1996年至今为《人类学批判》(Critique of Anthropology)杂志主编之一,并在中国多所大学有过演讲,包括北京大学、中国农业大学、中央民族大学等。
原文没翻译本那么难读
评分原文没翻译本那么难读
评分原文没翻译本那么难读
评分原文没翻译本那么难读
评分原文没翻译本那么难读
翻译赵旭东这个人算是出名了。我在忍无可忍之下,专门人肉搜索了他。这个人,98年就博士毕业,居然在讲师的位置上熬了7年,才升为副教授。也难怪,如此一个没有责任心的人,除了靠熬年头混饭吃,还能有什么作为呢? 如果有可能,我想重新看看这本书的一些原版章节。
评分按照章节整理一下读书笔记。可读性非常差的一本书,疯狂吐槽中文译本,译者相当死板的一个字一个字的对译了,完全不管别扭的用词和不通顺的语句╮(╯▽╰)╭ 第一章 重新界定民间宗教信仰与帝国正统仪式是“隐喻性的关系”,从而弥补既存解释模式的缺陷(马丁的表演论、尼德海...
评分断断续续好几天,睡前把这本书大致都翻了一遍。人类学宗教学写得很学术也不是我的强项,因而很难深入理解;后来学业繁忙,不知不觉就到了图书馆的归还日期 于是还了。 里面关于地方宗教仪式与帝国架构的关系的确很有趣,作者力求通过对中国农村习俗的田野研究,向外国人介绍整...
评分,,书我的是推荐的,但是请有能力的同学读原文吧,因为花的时间和你读译本的时间估计差不多。本来以为就我自己读不懂,还捶胸顿足的感慨了几天,后来一看,豆友们都读不懂,建议大家读原文,哎。听过一个搞翻译的老师说过这种情况,说那不是译者外语不好,是他中文不好,我想...
评分在中国历史的宏大叙事话语中,民间社会被湮没在大一统的政治幻象里,仿佛在推行中央集权的古典专制时代,它完全被自上而下的建构,不存在任何自发形成的可能性。这种对于历史的误读来自历史书写自身的局限。清末,梁启超就提出二十四史本质上是帝王的家谱写作,认为历史视角永...
The Imperial Metaphor pdf epub mobi txt 电子书 下载 2024