This is the first time one of the most important of Lukacs' early theoretical writings, published in Germany in 1923, has been made available in English. The book consists of a series of essays treating, among other topics, the definition of orthodox Marxism, the question of legality and illegality, Rosa Luxemburg as a Marxist, the changing function of Historic Marxism, class consciousness, and the substantiation and consciousness of the Proletariat.Writing in 1968, on the occasion of the appearance of his collected works, Lukacs evaluated the influence of this book as follows:"For the historical effect of History and Class Consciousness and also for the actuality of the present time one problem is of decisive importance: alienation, which is here treated for the first time since Marx as the central question of a revolutionary critique of capitalism, and whose historical as well as methodological origins are deeply rooted in Hegelian dialectic. It goes without saying that the problem was omnipresent. A few years after History and Class Consciousness was published, it was moved into the focus of philosophical discussion by Heidegger in his Being and Time, a place which it maintains to this day largely as a result of the position occupied by Sartre and his followers. The philologic question raised by L. Goldmann, who considered Heidegger's work partly as a polemic reply to my (admittedly unnamed) work, need not be discussed here. It suffices today to say that the problem was in the air, particularly if we analyze its background in detail in order to clarify its effect, the mixture of Marxist and Existentialist thought processes, which prevailed especially in France immediately after the Second World War. In this connection priorities, influences, and so on are not particularly significant. What is important is that the alienation of man was recognized and appreciated as the central problem of the time in which we live, by bourgeois as well as proletarian, by politically rightist and leftist thinkers. Thus, History and Class Consciousness exerted a profound effect in the circles of the youthful intelligentsia."George Lichtheim, also in 1968, writes that "...The originality of the early Lukacs lay in the assertion that the totality of history could be apprehended by adopting a particular 'class standpoint': that of the proletariat. Class consciousness;not indeed the empirical consciousness of the actual proletariat, which was hopelessly entangled with the surface aspects of objective reality, but an ideal-typical consciousness proper to a class which radically negates the existing order of reality: that was the formula which had made it possible for the Lukacs of 1923 to unify theory and practice."
卢卡奇是西方马克思主义的第一人,他的代表作《历史与阶级意识》更是西方马克思主义的必读书目。卢卡奇对于马克思的异化理论作为深入地分析,试图寻找当代资本主义困境的新出路,为以后的马克思主义者开辟了一条崭新的道路。断断续续看过两次,还是没有理解透彻,这也是哲学著...
評分1922年,时年37岁的卢卡奇在为《历史与阶级意识》这部论文集子专门写的《物化与无产阶级意识》一文中,发挥出属于自己的物化概念。我们必须看到,尽管物化与异化十分相似,卢卡奇也绝不止是一个马克思主义哲学史上的解释学、训诂学者,他在论述中散发出浓厚的黑格尔以及德国古...
評分此章此节卢卡奇首先陈述了“在资产阶级社会,只有资产阶级和无产阶级才是纯粹的阶级”的观点,然后便开始大加挞伐资产阶级意识的虚假乃至于虚伪。 有趣的是,卢卡奇说“这种当时的意识企图将‘计划经济’和资产阶级的阶级利益在经济上协调起来,而正在上升的资本主义的...
評分讀此書已經有一段時間了,算來應該也將近一年了,然而一直是不敢說算是把它讀完了,今天還是不敢。 讀書的時候常常被一種時空錯位感包圍,大有四面楚歌之感。這篇小短文事實上也是這種偶發的錯位感導致的感想的嬰兒。 盧卡奇與科爾施在23年一同出版的兩書(《歷史與階級意識》...
評分此章此节卢卡奇首先陈述了“在资产阶级社会,只有资产阶级和无产阶级才是纯粹的阶级”的观点,然后便开始大加挞伐资产阶级意识的虚假乃至于虚伪。 有趣的是,卢卡奇说“这种当时的意识企图将‘计划经济’和资产阶级的阶级利益在经济上协调起来,而正在上升的资本主义的...
讀瞭一點點,感覺Lukács的思路有些奇奇怪怪的- -可是顯然是Peter的菜嗎
评分讀瞭一點點,感覺Lukács的思路有些奇奇怪怪的- -可是顯然是Peter的菜嗎
评分瞎幾把亂寫黑格爾的東西
评分論煽顛的話,現在的公知和這位還有差距……
评分作為一本marxism的書,標價50刀讓我有點接受無能。
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美書屋 版权所有