This is the first time one of the most important of Lukacs' early theoretical writings, published in Germany in 1923, has been made available in English. The book consists of a series of essays treating, among other topics, the definition of orthodox Marxism, the question of legality and illegality, Rosa Luxemburg as a Marxist, the changing function of Historic Marxism, class consciousness, and the substantiation and consciousness of the Proletariat.Writing in 1968, on the occasion of the appearance of his collected works, Lukacs evaluated the influence of this book as follows:"For the historical effect of History and Class Consciousness and also for the actuality of the present time one problem is of decisive importance: alienation, which is here treated for the first time since Marx as the central question of a revolutionary critique of capitalism, and whose historical as well as methodological origins are deeply rooted in Hegelian dialectic. It goes without saying that the problem was omnipresent. A few years after History and Class Consciousness was published, it was moved into the focus of philosophical discussion by Heidegger in his Being and Time, a place which it maintains to this day largely as a result of the position occupied by Sartre and his followers. The philologic question raised by L. Goldmann, who considered Heidegger's work partly as a polemic reply to my (admittedly unnamed) work, need not be discussed here. It suffices today to say that the problem was in the air, particularly if we analyze its background in detail in order to clarify its effect, the mixture of Marxist and Existentialist thought processes, which prevailed especially in France immediately after the Second World War. In this connection priorities, influences, and so on are not particularly significant. What is important is that the alienation of man was recognized and appreciated as the central problem of the time in which we live, by bourgeois as well as proletarian, by politically rightist and leftist thinkers. Thus, History and Class Consciousness exerted a profound effect in the circles of the youthful intelligentsia."George Lichtheim, also in 1968, writes that "...The originality of the early Lukacs lay in the assertion that the totality of history could be apprehended by adopting a particular 'class standpoint': that of the proletariat. Class consciousness;not indeed the empirical consciousness of the actual proletariat, which was hopelessly entangled with the surface aspects of objective reality, but an ideal-typical consciousness proper to a class which radically negates the existing order of reality: that was the formula which had made it possible for the Lukacs of 1923 to unify theory and practice."
“现实”(Werklickeit)概念是黑格尔哲学和马克思的社会政治思想之间一个重要的连接,而在卢卡奇那里,这个概念是在第二国际主导马克思学说话语权的情况下开启马克思思想之黑格尔解释传统的一个关键入口。因此,比较他们对“现实”的不同解释是考察三位思想家哲学姿态、思想异...
評分1922年,时年37岁的卢卡奇在为《历史与阶级意识》这部论文集子专门写的《物化与无产阶级意识》一文中,发挥出属于自己的物化概念。我们必须看到,尽管物化与异化十分相似,卢卡奇也绝不止是一个马克思主义哲学史上的解释学、训诂学者,他在论述中散发出浓厚的黑格尔以及德国古...
評分断断续续地看了一个月,读完了除两篇卢森堡以及合法性和非法性的所有文章。 1. 规范性和人本主义问题 卢卡奇的反物化和对自由的强调并非是人本主义式的对人的本质的先验预设,或是规范性式地假设的“应当”,而是从物化意识导致的问题与危机,其背后的资产阶级思想的方法论问题...
評分1922年,时年37岁的卢卡奇在为《历史与阶级意识》这部论文集子专门写的《物化与无产阶级意识》一文中,发挥出属于自己的物化概念。我们必须看到,尽管物化与异化十分相似,卢卡奇也绝不止是一个马克思主义哲学史上的解释学、训诂学者,他在论述中散发出浓厚的黑格尔以及德国古...
評分讀此書已經有一段時間了,算來應該也將近一年了,然而一直是不敢說算是把它讀完了,今天還是不敢。 讀書的時候常常被一種時空錯位感包圍,大有四面楚歌之感。這篇小短文事實上也是這種偶發的錯位感導致的感想的嬰兒。 盧卡奇與科爾施在23年一同出版的兩書(《歷史與階級意識》...
作為一本marxism的書,標價50刀讓我有點接受無能。
评分瞎幾把亂寫黑格爾的東西
评分心力交瘁。。
评分後麵整個西馬的意識形態策略,很大程度上就是來源於盧卡奇基於知識領域的“勞動分工”是一場騙局的判斷延展開的,盧卡奇主張重新恢復總體性以對抗資本主義無限分工帶來的人的懸置。核心幾篇論述比較囉嗦,但是觀點非常精彩。後麵西馬很多的概念都是來源於這本書,當然再往迴可以追溯到馬剋思和黑格爾。
评分真是夠難懂的,讀著火大。異化理論尤其冗長難懂,曆史唯物主義那部分還好。。
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美書屋 版权所有