In this pathbreaking work, now available in paperback, Charles Tilly challenges all previous formulations of state development in Europe. Specifically, Tilly charges that most available explanations fail because they do not account for the great variety of kinds of states which were viable at different stages of European history, and because they assume a unilinear path of state development resolving in today's national state.
Charles Tilly (May 27, 1929 – April 29, 2008) was an American sociologist, political scientist, and historian who wrote on the relationship between politics and society. He was the Joseph L. Buttenwieser Professor of Social Science at Columbia University.
Tilly's academic work covered multiple topics in the social sciences and influenced scholarship in disciplines outside of sociology, including history and political science. He is considered a major figure in the development of historical sociology, the early use of quantitative methods in historical analysis, the methodology of event cataloguing, the turn towards relational and social-network modes of inquiry, the development of process- and mechanism-based analysis, as well as the study of: contentious politics, social movements, the history of labor, state formation, revolutions, democratization, inequality, and urban sociology.
张 弛:评《强制、资本和欧洲国家(公元990-1992年)》一书的翻译问题 时间:2009年4月13日 作者:张弛(北京大学历史学系研究生) 来源:中国政法大学学报 关键词: 年近八十的查尔斯•梯利是美国哥伦比亚大学特聘的约瑟夫•L•伯腾威泽(The Joseph. Buttenwieser)...
評分[美]查尔斯·蒂利.强制、资本和欧洲国家[M].2007 第一章 世界历史中的城市和国家 ·把国家定义成不同于家庭和亲属团体运用强制的组织。2 ·问题:如何解释990年以来欧洲盛行国家类型在时空上的巨大差异,而后来都成了民族国家的不同变体?为什么如此相似的方向道路如此不同? ...
評分可能翻译有一些问题,使得我对这本书的理解有些问题。当然,更重要的还是我对西方历史的欠账:从这个方面来说,这是我的问题,不能太多的寻找客观原因。因为,正如阅读卡尔·波兰尼的《大转型》一样,历史的欠账使得对这一类书籍的阅读变成了走马观花。但是,我还是要强调...
評分好好的一本学术著作就这么给糟蹋了。百度了一下译者的情况,看来外行真是最好不要出位搞翻译,套用译者另一部译作的标题,读他的翻译简直就是“一个政治学学生的梦魇”。 “很差”的评价不是给原著的,而是给翻译的。
not so coherent as works of Anderson, Mann, and Moore.
评分戰爭與國傢相互塑造,這在三種類型中是不同的,最後演變成national state。韋伯的國傢定義在早期歐洲是不成立的。對於歐洲研究是有意義的。擴展到歐洲外有局限性(中國),比如強調國傢無法通過財政滿足戰爭需要,國傢間的戰爭競爭(state system)。
评分Flipping over Marx's historical materialism, but still attached to it
评分為中文版默哀……
评分經典,無需多說,不過蒂利的理論略顯宏大,也許這本書沒有空間寫細節瞭
本站所有內容均為互聯網搜索引擎提供的公開搜索信息,本站不存儲任何數據與內容,任何內容與數據均與本站無關,如有需要請聯繫相關搜索引擎包括但不限於百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2025 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美書屋 版权所有