In this pathbreaking work, now available in paperback, Charles Tilly challenges all previous formulations of state development in Europe. Specifically, Tilly charges that most available explanations fail because they do not account for the great variety of kinds of states which were viable at different stages of European history, and because they assume a unilinear path of state development resolving in today's national state.
Charles Tilly (May 27, 1929 – April 29, 2008) was an American sociologist, political scientist, and historian who wrote on the relationship between politics and society. He was the Joseph L. Buttenwieser Professor of Social Science at Columbia University.
Tilly's academic work covered multiple topics in the social sciences and influenced scholarship in disciplines outside of sociology, including history and political science. He is considered a major figure in the development of historical sociology, the early use of quantitative methods in historical analysis, the methodology of event cataloguing, the turn towards relational and social-network modes of inquiry, the development of process- and mechanism-based analysis, as well as the study of: contentious politics, social movements, the history of labor, state formation, revolutions, democratization, inequality, and urban sociology.
带着对刘仲敬“封建制度积累创造组织资源,大一统消耗组织资源”这一论断的怀疑,来看tilly对欧洲国家建设的解释。Tilly认为国家能力建设的过程,就是coercion与capital的集中化,通过没收公民的武器,解散封建制度中各分封领主的武装,来垄断暴力,来达到前者,而税收制度的建...
评分评魏洪钟译《强制、资本和欧洲国家(公元990-1992年)》 原载于《中国政法大学学报》,作者授权上载 评魏洪钟译《强制、资本和欧洲国家(公元990-1992年)》 张弛 年近八十的查尔斯•梯利是美国哥伦比亚大学特聘的约瑟夫•L•伯腾威泽(The Joseph. Buttenwieser)社会...
评分Most of today’s literatures addressing the issue of elite incentives and state-formation are more or less inspired by Tilly’s brilliant writing. In his widely cited article and the later book, Tilly highlights the crucial role war-making plays in the maki...
评分好好的一本学术著作就这么给糟蹋了。百度了一下译者的情况,看来外行真是最好不要出位搞翻译,套用译者另一部译作的标题,读他的翻译简直就是“一个政治学学生的梦魇”。 “很差”的评价不是给原著的,而是给翻译的。
评分在当今的世界,每个国家都在通过自己所控制的资源(如课堂教育和宣传),在本地区传统的宗教、语言和部族等基础上,来打造诸如“法兰西民族”、“大和民族”、“美利坚民族”或“德意志民族”等等观念。用社会学术语来说,我们可以把这些观念称为“想象的共同体”。这一“想象...
not so coherent as works of Anderson, Mann, and Moore.
评分Flipping over Marx's historical materialism, but still attached to it
评分历史社会学能做成这样子,算力大陈雄了吧?
评分梯利观点极易被简化,遗憾。欧洲战争和军事演变触发权力向国家的集中。强制和资本在辩证关系中相互促进,使得民间武装逐渐成为国家暴力,租-贡关系逐渐变成财政系统。意外后果是国家将国民同质化,国家-社会关系变得更为直接,社会运动和公民权利兴起。强制-资本的组合与逻辑解释欧洲国家殊途同归
评分经典,无需多说,不过蒂利的理论略显宏大,也许这本书没有空间写细节了
本站所有内容均为互联网搜索引擎提供的公开搜索信息,本站不存储任何数据与内容,任何内容与数据均与本站无关,如有需要请联系相关搜索引擎包括但不限于百度,google,bing,sogou 等
© 2026 book.quotespace.org All Rights Reserved. 小美书屋 版权所有